Skip to main content

Security report for anonymised.io

ID Ward, trading as Anonymised · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anonymised, operated by ID Ward, is a privacy-focused adtech platform specializing in ID-less data solutions that enable publishers and advertisers to target and measure audiences without exposing personal data. The company positions itself as a cutting-edge provider in the privacy-first advertising ecosystem, offering services such as audience targeting, customer discovery with AI, and cohort-based attribution. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by recognized industry certifications and a strong emphasis on GDPR compliance. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and InMobi's Consent Management Platform. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, moderate performance, and solid SEO practices. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and consent management, though explicit security headers could be improved. From a security perspective, the site shows a mature privacy posture with no exposed sensitive data or visible vulnerabilities. The presence of multiple trust seals and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism indicates a strong commitment to regulatory compliance. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and security policies suggests areas for enhancement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally managed, with a strong focus on privacy and compliance. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data is consistent with privacy protection practices justified by the business nature. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and maintaining rigorous vulnerability management to sustain trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of anonymised.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anonymised.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
98
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anonymised operates in the technology and media sectors, targeting publishers and advertisers who require privacy-compliant audience targeting solutions. Their business model revolves around providing anonymised, ID-less data services that enable effective marketing without compromising user privacy. The company leverages AI and granular audience data to offer customer discovery and attribution services. Their market position is that of a privacy-first innovator in adtech, supported by partnerships and certifications from industry bodies such as IAB and AOP. The presence of reputable client logos and European offices indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a growing footprint in the privacy-centric advertising market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a robust consent management framework in place. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected. GDPR compliance is evident through cookie banners and privacy policy disclosures. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy suggests room for improvement. The use of third-party scripts is managed with consent, but ongoing monitoring is recommended to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture aligns well with business needs but could be strengthened by formalizing security governance and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information and security policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain up-to-date privacy and compliance documentation aligned with evolving regulations such as GDPR and NIS2.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ID Ward, trading as Anonymised
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ID Ward, trading as Anonymised
Description
Anonymised is the ID-less data platform that helps publishers and advertisers understand, reach and measure audiences at scale, without exposing any personal data.
Key services
Audience targeting with ID-less data, Customer discovery using granular audience data and AI, Attribution with cohort-based data, Cross-publisher audience monetisation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, InMobi CMP (Consent Management Platform), jQuery 3.5.1, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Webflow, Google Consent Framework
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
InMobi
Marketing tools
InMobi CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong focus on privacy and GDPR compliance
  3. No exposed sensitive or personal data
  4. Professional design and consistent branding
  5. Multiple trust seals and certifications displayed
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage or footer
  7. Contact primarily via demo booking and subscription forms
  8. WHOIS data unavailable or privacy protected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Webflow CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for interactivity and user experience enhancements. Google Tag Manager is employed for analytics and marketing tag management, while InMobi's CMP handles consent management. The site is hosted on Webflow's infrastructure, providing reliable performance and scalability. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, though accessibility could be improved. SEO practices are well implemented with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack supports the business goals effectively but should incorporate stronger security headers and continuous performance monitoring to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anonymised.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anonymised.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.