Skip to main content

Security report for anonymised.io

ID Ward, trading as Anonymised · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anonymised, operated by ID Ward, is a privacy-first data platform specializing in ID-less audience targeting and measurement solutions for publishers and advertisers. Positioned as a cutting-edge alternative to traditional cookie-based targeting, the company leverages proprietary technology to enable large-scale audience reach without exposing personal data. The platform supports audience targeting, customer discovery through AI, and attribution measurement using cohort-based data, catering primarily to digital advertising and publishing sectors. The company maintains offices in London, UK, and Barcelona, Spain, and demonstrates strong compliance with GDPR and industry standards through multiple certifications and a robust consent management framework. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, integrating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, and employs Google Tag Manager and InMobi CMP for analytics and consent management. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, features good SEO practices, and maintains moderate performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and user consent mechanisms in place. From a security perspective, the site shows good adherence to best practices, including anonymization of user data and integration of consent management platforms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected. However, the absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts suggests room for enhancement in transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which aligns with the company’s privacy-centric business model. Overall, Anonymised presents a professional, trustworthy, and privacy-compliant digital presence with a clear business focus on privacy-first audience targeting. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security and incident response policies, and maintaining vigilance on third-party script security to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anonymised.io

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anonymised operates in the technology and media sectors, targeting publishers and advertisers who require privacy-compliant audience targeting solutions. Its business model revolves around providing anonymized, ID-less data services that enable clients to reach and measure audiences without compromising personal data privacy. The company leverages proprietary technology and AI to deliver superior targeting accuracy and scale, positioning itself as a leader in the cookieless advertising ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, data services, and campaign measurement tools. The company has established partnerships with industry bodies such as IAB and AOP, enhancing its credibility and market reach. The presence of multiple international offices and a medium-sized organizational footprint indicates a growing enterprise with ambitions for broader market penetration. The website’s content and branding consistently reflect a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness, supporting its competitive positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of a consent management platform that aligns with GDPR requirements. The absence of exposed sensitive data and the use of anonymized audience data reflect strong data protection practices. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates opportunities for improvement. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, consistent with privacy protection practices, but this limits external verification of domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and demonstrate readiness to handle security incidents.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices, ensuring ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ID Ward, trading as Anonymised
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ID Ward, trading as Anonymised
Description
Anonymised is the ID-less data platform that helps publishers and advertisers understand, reach and measure audiences at scale, without exposing any personal data.
Key services
Audience targeting with ID-less data, Customer discovery using granular audience data and AI, Attribution measurement with cohort-based data
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, InMobi CMP, Swiper.js, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management platform integrated
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
InMobi
Marketing tools
InMobi CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on privacy and GDPR compliance with integrated CMP.
  3. No WHOIS data available, likely due to privacy protection or query failure.
  4. Professional design and consistent branding.
  5. Multiple trust seals and industry certifications displayed.
  6. Social media presence on major platforms.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML.
  8. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed.
  9. Physical addresses in London, UK and Barcelona, Spain provided.
  10. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern front-end technologies including jQuery 3.5.1 and Swiper.js for interactive components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management, while InMobi CMP handles consent management, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. The site is hosted on Webflow’s infrastructure, which provides reliable performance and HTTPS support. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. However, the site lacks some advanced security headers and accessibility features, which are areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anonymised.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anonymised.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.