Skip to main content

Security report for altacom.eu

Altacom · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Altacom is a well-established distributor specializing in cybersecurity and IT infrastructure solutions, serving the Baltic countries and Finland. With over 14 years of experience, the company partners with globally recognized vendors such as Bitdefender, N-able, and Utimaco to provide a comprehensive portfolio of products and services. Their target audience includes businesses seeking robust cybersecurity, data protection, and managed service provider tools. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supporting their market position as a trusted distributor in the region. Technically, the website is built using modern technologies including the Astro framework, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Google Maps API for location services. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO and accessibility practices. The use of Partytown indicates an effort to optimize third-party script loading, enhancing user experience. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs secure form practices, including a privacy policy consent checkbox. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for enhanced security and compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could be improved to strengthen trust and transparency. Overall, Altacom's website demonstrates a solid digital presence with good business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security policies would further enhance their security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of altacom.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching altacom.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Altacom operates as an important entity within the technology sector, focusing on distribution of cybersecurity and IT solutions in the Baltic and Finnish markets. Their business model centers on partnerships with leading global vendors, enabling them to offer a curated portfolio of advanced security and IT infrastructure products. The company targets businesses requiring protection against cyber threats and efficient IT management tools, including MSPs. Their market position is strengthened by over a decade of experience and regional presence with multiple offices. The website content and vendor partnerships indicate a mature and stable operation with growth potential through expanding vendor relationships and service offerings.

Security posture

Altacom exhibits a moderate to high security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and secure form handling. The absence of key security headers and a cookie consent mechanism represents compliance gaps that could expose the company to privacy regulation risks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are visible, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of modern web technologies and script offloading via Partytown is a positive security practice. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner to comply with EU cookie regulations and improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy policies and security practices to align with evolving regulations and industry standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Altacom
Description
Altacom is an official distributor of globally known vendors like Bitdefender, N-able, HaloPSA, Solarwinds, Utimaco and more in Baltic countries and Finland. They provide high quality cybersecurity, data protection, HSM, PKI, and IT infrastructure solutions to help businesses grow and safeguard their operations.
Key services
Cyber Security solutions, Data Security solutions, HSM and PKI solutions, Tools for MSPs, Professional services automation, Training services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Astro v4.3.5, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Partytown (for script offloading)
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Partytown to offload third-party scripts
  • Secure contact form with required privacy policy consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear focus on cybersecurity and IT solutions distribution in Baltic and Finnish markets.
  3. Multiple regional offices with physical addresses and contact details provided.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite use of tracking scripts.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  6. Contact form includes privacy policy consent checkbox.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages the Astro static site generator framework, which supports fast loading times and modern web standards. Integration of Google Tag Manager and Google Maps API indicates a mature approach to analytics and location services. The use of Partytown for offloading third-party scripts demonstrates attention to performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with well-structured navigation and SEO-friendly metadata. No CMS is detected beyond Astro, suggesting a static or hybrid approach. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, with opportunities to enhance security headers and privacy mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with altacom.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review altacom.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.