Skip to main content

Security report for altacom.eu

Altacom · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Altacom is a well-established distributor specializing in cybersecurity and IT infrastructure solutions, serving Baltic countries and Finland. The company partners with globally recognized vendors such as Bitdefender, N-able, and Utimaco, offering a broad portfolio including cybersecurity, data protection, HSM, PKI, and MSP tools. Their market position is solid with over 14 years of experience, targeting businesses seeking reliable IT security solutions. Technically, the website is built using modern technologies including Astro framework and employs Google Tag Manager and Google Maps APIs for analytics and location services. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, though some improvements are possible. Performance is moderate with optimizations like Partytown for third-party script offloading. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and shows good practices such as no exposed sensitive data and script offloading to improve security. However, it lacks explicit security headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and published security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and business-focused with a strong regional presence. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance and security transparency would further strengthen its posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching altacom.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Altacom operates as a key regional distributor in the cybersecurity and IT solutions sector, leveraging partnerships with major global vendors. Their business model centers on providing high-quality security products and services to enterprises and MSPs in the Baltic and Finnish markets. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its long-standing vendor relationships, regional expertise, and comprehensive product portfolio. Revenue streams likely include product distribution, licensing, and training services. The target customers are businesses requiring advanced cybersecurity and IT management solutions. Growth indicators include a diverse vendor ecosystem and multiple regional offices. Strategic partnerships with industry leaders enhance their market credibility and operational reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of modern script management techniques to reduce attack surface. However, the absence of key security headers and lack of publicly available security policies or incident response information indicate room for maturity improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, suggesting good operational security hygiene. Compliance with GDPR is implied by the presence of a privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, representing a compliance gap. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure processes are not visible, which could impact trust and regulatory adherence. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish explicit security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and ensure all third-party scripts and libraries are up to date to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide terms of service to improve legal clarity and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Altacom
Description
Altacom is an official distributor of globally known vendors like Bitdefender, N-able, HaloPSA, Solarwinds, Utimaco and more in Baltic countries and Finland. They provide high quality cybersecurity, data protection, HSM, PKI, and IT infrastructure solutions to businesses.
Key services
Cyber Security solutions, Data Security solutions, HSM and PKI solutions, Tools for MSPs, Training services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Astro v4.3.5, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Partytown (for third-party script offloading)
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://altacom.eu/)
  • Use of Partytown to offload third-party scripts improving security and performance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear focus on cybersecurity and IT solutions distribution in Baltic and Finnish markets.
  3. Multiple regional offices with physical addresses and contact details provided.
  4. No evidence of security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of Google Tag Manager.
  6. No terms of service page found.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization techniques.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Astro static site generator framework, leveraging modern web technologies and performance optimizations such as Partytown for third-party script offloading. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google Maps API for location services. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Hosting details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by adding caching headers and optimizing image delivery further. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with opportunities for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with altacom.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review altacom.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.