Skip to main content

Security report for adsafety.net

Online Solution Int Ltd · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adsafety.net is a small technology service provider specializing in ad and brand safety solutions, targeting advertisers, brands, and agencies. The website is a basic WordPress implementation with minimal content and limited user engagement features. The business appears to be operated by Online Solution Int Ltd, a German company established in 2014, with the domain registration consistent with this timeline. The site uses standard web technologies including WordPress, jQuery, and Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is limited, with a basic privacy policy in German but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service visible. Contact information is not explicitly provided on the homepage, which may impact user trust and engagement.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of adsafety.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adsafety.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention adsafety.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for adsafety.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche market of ad and brand safety, providing solutions likely aimed at digital advertisers and marketing agencies. The business model appears service-oriented, with a focus on technology solutions for advertising safety. The parent company, Online Solution Int Ltd, is referenced in the footer, indicating a small but established entity. The website's minimal content and lack of detailed business information suggest a modest market presence. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates some level of digital marketing and user behavior tracking, though transparency and compliance could be improved. The partnership with Online Solution Int Ltd suggests a close operational relationship or ownership.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer lock, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, minimizing immediate attack vectors, but the lack of incident response contacts or security policies is a gap in security governance. The use of Google Analytics without a cookie consent mechanism raises privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Add comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  4. Publish detailed contact information and terms of service to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Online Solution Int Ltd
Description
Ad + Brand Safety Solutions
Key services
Ad safety, Brand safety solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress Twenty Seventeen theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a basic WordPress site with minimal content
  2. Privacy policy is present but only in German and basic
  3. No cookie consent or terms of service found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts are used without visible cookie consent
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content
  7. Domain is registered with Cloudflare and has clientTransferProhibited status
  8. No DNSSEC enabled for domain
  9. Site branding is consistent with company name and logo
  10. No forms detected on homepage
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 using the Twenty Seventeen theme, a stable but older default theme. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site loads with moderate speed and basic mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are minimal but present. There is technical debt in the form of missing security headers and lack of modern privacy compliance tools. The site would benefit from modernization efforts including improved mobile responsiveness, enhanced SEO metadata, and stronger security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100 −1Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 67/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adsafety.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adsafety.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.