Skip to main content

Security report for adsafety.net

Online Solution Int Ltd · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adsafety.net is a small technology-focused website offering ad and brand safety solutions, powered by Online Solution Int Ltd, a German company. The website is built on WordPress and uses standard technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics with IP anonymization. The content is minimal and primarily serves as a landing page with a link to a privacy policy in German. There is no visible contact information or terms of service, and no cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and DNSSEC. The domain is well-established since 2014 and registered via Cloudflare, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but basic in content and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adsafety.net

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention adsafety.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for adsafety.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on ad and brand safety solutions targeting advertisers and brands concerned with digital advertising risks. The company appears to be small-sized with limited online presence and minimal direct customer engagement features on the website. The partnership with Online Solution Int Ltd provides a legal and operational base in Germany. The business model likely revolves around providing safety solutions and consulting for digital advertising. The lack of detailed service descriptions and contact channels suggests a low digital maturity or a site primarily for informational purposes.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization, reflecting some privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for domain security enhancement. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the HTML content. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information and terms of service to enhance business credibility.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Online Solution Int Ltd
Description
Ad + Brand Safety Solutions
Key services
Ad safety, Brand safety solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics IP anonymization

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site focused on ad and brand safety solutions.
  2. Content is minimal and mostly placeholder with a link to privacy policy in German.
  3. No contact forms or direct contact information visible on the homepage.
  4. No cookie consent banner or terms of service found.
  5. Uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization indicating some privacy consideration.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain registered with Cloudflare since 2014, expiring in 2026.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Powered by Online Solution Int Ltd, a German company.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with jQuery 3.7.1 and uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure and HTTPS support. The site loads with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are minimal but present. The technical stack is modern but lacks advanced optimization and security hardening. The site could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 67/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adsafety.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adsafety.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.