Skip to main content

Security report for zsospe.cz

Základní škola Pelhřimov, Osvobození 1881 · Education · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Základní škola Pelhřimov, Osvobození 1881 is a modern primary educational institution located in Pelhřimov, Czech Republic. The school offers comprehensive educational services including primary education, after-school care, and a school canteen. It actively engages with parents and students through a well-structured website featuring detailed information, social media presence, and accessible contact channels. The school positions itself as a community-focused institution emphasizing safe and inspiring learning environments. Technically, the website is built using a custom CMS (StaMPi) with modern web technologies such as jQuery and CookieConsent for privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a moderate performance profile. Security best practices are partially implemented, including HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lack formal security policies and incident response contacts. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, improvements are recommended in publishing security policies, incident response information, and enhancing HTTP security headers. Privacy compliance is strong with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent banner. Overall, the website reflects a trustworthy and professional educational institution with a good balance of content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and incident readiness would further strengthen its risk posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zsospe.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates as a public educational entity serving the local community in Pelhřimov. Its business model focuses on providing primary education and related services such as after-school programs and meal provision. The website indicates a medium-sized institution with a stable market position supported by partnerships with educational and governmental organizations. The presence of social media and community engagement tools suggests active outreach and communication strategies. Revenue streams are likely public funding and service fees for meals and extracurricular activities. The school maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and trust signals, positioning it well within the local education sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers indicates room for improvement. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure mechanism or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from formalizing security governance and enhancing technical controls to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Základní škola Pelhřimov, Osvobození 1881
Registration number
70876096
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Základní škola Pelhřimov, Osvobození 1881
Description
Základní škola Pelhřimov, Osvobození is a modern and accessible primary school with after-school care, canteen, and specialized classrooms located in a modern school complex. The school emphasizes active learning, community involvement, and a safe environment.
Key services
Primary education, After-school care (družina), School canteen services, Specialized classrooms and extracurricular activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, CookieConsent 3.0.3, Fancybox 2.1.5, Google Fonts (Poppins)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with settings
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a modern, accessible primary school site with comprehensive information for parents and students.
  2. Strong presence of official contact details and social media links.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user controls.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS platform (StaMPi) with jQuery and CookieConsent libraries to manage interactivity and privacy compliance. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts to improve page load times. No major technical debt or obsolete technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement modern frameworks or CDNs to further improve performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zsospe.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zsospe.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.