Skip to main content

Security report for zmogausteisiugidas.lt

Žmogaus teisių gidas · Education · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Žmogaus teisių gidas is a Lithuanian educational website dedicated to human rights and civic education. It offers thematic articles, tests, court practice summaries, and resources to educate the public on human rights issues. The site targets a general audience interested in learning about human rights in everyday situations. The platform is supported by reputable European and Baltic organizations, indicating a non-profit educational mission. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Matomo analytics with privacy-respecting default settings, Google Fonts, and cookie consent mechanisms. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with a clear navigation structure. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS enforced but lacking explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosures. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the website is a credible educational resource with room for improvement in privacy policy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zmogausteisiugidas.lt

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the education and non-profit sector, focusing on human rights awareness in Lithuania. It leverages partnerships with Erasmus Plus, Nordplus, Baltic Human Rights, and government ministries, enhancing its credibility and reach. The business model is informational and educational, likely funded by grants and donations. The target customer segment is the general public, educators, and civil society actors interested in human rights. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its localized, thematic content and multi-language support. Growth potential exists through expanded partnerships and enhanced digital presence. The absence of direct contact information and WHOIS data suggests a cautious approach to privacy and domain registration transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used site-wide, and cookie consent is implemented with opt-in and opt-out options, reflecting GDPR awareness. Matomo analytics is configured to deny tracking by default, enhancing privacy compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from publishing a comprehensive privacy policy, security policy, and contact channels for security incidents to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive and accessible privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts and general support emails or phone numbers.
  5. Enhance SEO metadata completeness and structured data to improve discoverability and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Žmogaus teisių gidas
Description
Educational and informational website focused on human rights and civic education, providing thematic content, tests, court practices, and resources related to human rights topics.
Key services
Human rights thematic articles, Rights information, Tests on human rights knowledge, Court practice summaries, Support organizations information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Google Fonts (Manrope), CookieConsent library, SVG icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Analytics consent denied by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an educational resource focused on human rights in Lithuania.
  2. Content is in Lithuanian with language alternates for Russian and English.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with opt-in and opt-out options.
  5. Matomo analytics used with default denial of consent for tracking.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or blocked, limiting domain trust analysis.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit privacy policy page detected in provided content.
  9. Terms of service page exists at /salygos-1.
  10. Website uses HTTPS and modern web fonts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Matomo analytics, Google Fonts, and SVG icons. It employs cookie consent libraries and supports multiple languages with hreflang tags. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with font size and theme options. Performance is moderate with preconnect hints and preloading of key assets. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks explicit structured data (JSON-LD) for organization or business schema. Technical debt is low, but improvements in metadata and security headers are recommended to reduce risk and improve SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zmogausteisiugidas.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zmogausteisiugidas.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.