Skip to main content

Security report for zepasaka.lv

Zeltābeles pasaka · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zeltābeles pasaka is a licensed private kindergarten operating in Riga, Latvia since 2013, with a branch established in 2021. The website serves as an informational platform targeting local parents and guardians seeking early childhood education services. The business model is focused on private kindergarten services with municipal co-financing support. The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no direct contact information is clearly presented in the HTML content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zepasaka.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The kindergarten operates in the education sector, specifically early childhood education, serving a local market in Riga, Latvia. It benefits from municipal funding, indicating a degree of local government support. The business appears small in size and focused on providing quality childcare and learning environments. The website's use of modern frameworks and tracking tools suggests a moderate level of digital maturity. Absence of detailed contact and policy information may impact trust and user engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with IP anonymization in Google Analytics, which is positive for user privacy. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zeltābeles pasaka
Description
Zeltābeles pasaka ir licencēts privātais dārziņš, kas darbojas kopš 2013. gada Kaņieru ielā 10 ar nosaukumu Zeltābele. 2021. gadā tika izveidota filiāle Prūšu ielā 81. Saņem visus pašvaldību piedāvātos līdzfinansējumus.
Key services
Early childhood education, Kindergarten services, Child adaptation and learning environment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a licensed private kindergarten in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local parents.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern React/Gatsby framework with Google and Facebook tracking.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Gatsby, a React-based static site generator, indicating a modern and performant infrastructure. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, which are industry-standard tools. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The HTML content is valid and well-structured, but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or rich snippets detected. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zepasaka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zepasaka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.