Skip to main content

Security report for yufe.hr

Yufe · Education · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

YUFE (Young Universities for the Future of Europe) is a European University Alliance comprising 10 partner universities, focused on providing innovative educational opportunities, civic engagement activities, and staff development across Europe. The alliance is recognized by the European Commission and aims to add a European dimension to studies and careers. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-structured, targeting students, researchers, academic staff, citizens, and organizations. It leverages modern web technologies including WordPress, Google Tag Manager, and multimedia embeds to deliver an engaging user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is evident with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie management. The domain is privacy-protected under EURid, which is typical for .eu domains and justified for this type of organization. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and credible digital presence for an educational alliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yufe.hr

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

YUFE operates as a collaborative educational alliance, offering cross-border university courses, civic engagement, and professional development. Its market position is strong within the European higher education sector, supported by European Commission selection and a network of 10 universities. The business model focuses on knowledge sharing, student mobility, and lifelong learning. The alliance targets diverse audiences including students, early career researchers, academic staff, citizens, and organizations. The website reflects a mature digital strategy with SEO optimization, structured data, and multimedia content. Partnerships and events are prominently featured, indicating active engagement and growth. Revenue streams are likely based on educational grants, partnerships, and possibly service fees for specialized programs. The alliance benefits from a strong brand and consistent messaging across its digital assets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response information suggests room to enhance transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and stakeholder confidence.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize vulnerabilities from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security reporting.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy including continuous monitoring, penetration testing, and staff security awareness training.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yufe
Description
The Young Universities for the Future of Europe (YUFE) is one of the dynamic European University Alliances, selected by the European Commission.
Key services
On & Offline University level courses, Civic engagement activities, Languages courses, Staff development opportunities, Repository of knowledge resources
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Vimeo embed, YouTube embed, Google Tag Manager, Mailchimp, CookieYes
Frameworks
Rank Math SEO, Google Tag Manager for WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Mailchimp tracking
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on European university alliance and educational services
  3. Good use of SEO and structured data for enhanced search presence
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely via forms
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found publicly
  6. No WHOIS registrant data available due to privacy protection by EURid
  7. Use of modern web technologies and third-party integrations
  8. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including PHP, JavaScript, and integration of multimedia content via Vimeo and YouTube embeds. SEO is optimized using Rank Math PRO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for rich search results. Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp are used for analytics and marketing automation. The site shows good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features such as an accessibility toolbar. Performance is moderate with caching and minification techniques applied. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and further optimize loading times. The infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for a large educational alliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yufe.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yufe.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.