Skip to main content

Security report for xueshuyu.com

Education · China

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

学术鱼导航（xueshuyu.com）是一个专注于学术资源和科研工具的导航平台，主要面向科研人员和学术研究者，提供丰富的文献检索、AI论文写作、查重、润色、翻译等服务入口。网站内容丰富且结构清晰，采用WordPress搭建，技术栈包括jQuery、Bootstrap和Swiper，移动端优化良好。域名注册信息透明，注册于2024年，符合新兴学术工具平台的定位。安全方面启用了HTTPS，但未启用DNSSEC，且缺少部分安全HTTP头部，隐私合规性不足，未发现隐私政策和Cookie政策页面，缺少明确联系方式和安全事件响应渠道，建议完善相关合规和安全措施。整体网站设计专业，内容相关性高，用户体验良好，适合学术用户使用。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xueshuyu.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

该网站定位为学术导航和AI辅助论文写作工具集成平台，目标客户为科研人员和学术研究者。通过整合多种学术搜索引擎、文献数据库和AI写作工具，提供一站式学术资源访问。商业模式可能依赖推广合作和流量变现。市场定位专业，竞争优势在于丰富的AI论文工具和中文学术资源整合。缺乏公开的联系方式和合规政策可能影响用户信任和合作机会。未来可通过完善合规政策和安全响应提升业务信誉和市场竞争力。

Security posture

网站启用HTTPS，域名状态为clientTransferProhibited，显示一定的域名安全意识。未启用DNSSEC，存在一定的DNS安全风险。缺少安全相关HTTP头部，可能影响防御XSS、点击劫持等攻击。无发现安全事件响应或漏洞披露机制，缺乏安全文化体现。未检测到敏感信息泄露或明显漏洞。建议加强DNS安全配置，完善HTTP安全头部，建立安全事件响应流程，提升整体安全成熟度。

Recommendations

  1. 启用DNSSEC以提升域名解析安全，防止DNS欺骗攻击。
  2. 增加并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策页面，提升合规性和用户信任。
  3. 完善安全HTTP头部配置，如Content-Security-Policy、X-Content-Type-Options等，增强防护能力。
  4. 建立安全事件响应和漏洞披露机制，公开安全联系方式（如security@邮箱）。
  5. 增加明确的联系方式（邮箱、电话或联系表单），方便用户和合作伙伴沟通。
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
学术鱼导航是一个面向科研人员和学术用户的导航网站，提供丰富的学术资源入口和AI辅助论文写作工具，涵盖文献检索、论文写作、查重、润色、翻译、学术搜索引擎等服务。
Key services
学术文献检索, AI论文写作工具, 论文查重, 文献阅读与管理, 学术搜索引擎导航
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, FontAwesome, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. 网站为学术资源导航平台，内容丰富，涵盖多种学术工具和AI论文辅助服务。
  2. 无发现隐私政策、Cookie政策及服务条款页面，隐私合规性不足。
  3. 未发现明确的联系方式、电话或邮箱，缺乏直接联系渠道。
  4. 技术栈基于WordPress，使用主流前端库和框架，移动端优化良好。
  5. 安全配置基本，启用HTTPS但未启用DNSSEC，缺少安全HTTP头部。
  6. 无检测到广告网络或追踪服务，用户隐私风险较低。
  7. 内容安全评级为安全，无成人或不当内容。
  8. WHOIS信息透明且一致，域名新注册但符合业务定位。
Technical notes

Notes

网站基于WordPress CMS，使用jQuery、Bootstrap、Swiper和FontAwesome等主流前端技术，技术栈成熟且广泛支持。页面结构清晰，导航合理，支持移动端访问。托管使用Cloudflare DNS，提升DNS解析性能和安全。页面加载性能为中等，未检测到明显技术债务。缺少部分现代安全配置和隐私合规措施。建议持续优化性能和安全配置，提升用户体验和安全保障。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xueshuyu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xueshuyu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.