Skip to main content

Security report for wrightandwright.co.uk

Wright & Wright Architects LLP · Education · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wright & Wright Architects LLP is a London-based award-winning architectural practice specializing in sustainable, contextual, and innovative design primarily for the culture and education sectors. Their portfolio includes Passivhaus-certified projects and a strong commitment to carbon reduction and energy efficiency. The website reflects a professional and well-established firm with a clear focus on quality and sustainability. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Vimeo video integration, Google Tag Manager, and Typekit fonts. It is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, providing a seamless user experience. The presence of cookie consent management and privacy policies indicates good digital maturity and compliance with privacy regulations. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and a public security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS lookup failed due to querying a subdomain rather than the domain itself, but the website's professionalism and trust indicators suggest legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and good privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wrightandwright.co.uk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wright & Wright Architects LLP operates in a niche market focused on sustainable architecture for cultural and educational institutions. Their award-winning status and RIBA certification position them as a reputable player in the UK architecture sector. The business model centers on delivering high-quality, low-energy buildings with a strong emphasis on client collaboration and environmental responsibility. Their target customers are institutions and clients valuing sustainability and innovative design. The firm maintains an active digital presence with social media engagement and detailed project showcases, supporting growth and client acquisition. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent practice. The website's content quality and branding consistency reinforce their market position and professionalism.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No direct contact information for incident response or security policies is provided, limiting transparency in vulnerability management. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Vimeo is handled with privacy considerations (e.g., dnt parameters). No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and published security documentation to improve incident response readiness and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards for broader inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wright & Wright Architects LLP
Description
Wright and Wright Architects is an award-winning practice based in London. The practice maintains a strong portfolio of projects in the culture and education sectors.
Key services
Architectural design, Sustainable building design, Passivhaus certified projects, Consultancy on decarbonising historic estates
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Vimeo Player, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of iframe with privacy respecting parameters (dnt=true)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on sustainability and Passivhaus certification in projects.
  3. Cookie consent management is implemented with customization options.
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact form available.
  5. Social media links present for Instagram, LinkedIn, and Twitter.
  6. No visible security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. WHOIS data query was performed on 'www.wrightandwright.co.uk' which is a subdomain, causing failure; domain WHOIS likely exists for 'wrightandwright.co.uk'.
  8. Website uses modern web technologies and external services responsibly.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, leveraging external services such as Vimeo for video content and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Fonts are served via Adobe Typekit. The site is optimized for fast loading and mobile responsiveness, with preconnect and preload hints to improve performance. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detectable. The site uses a custom cookie consent manager with granular control. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, with opportunities to improve security headers and add structured data for enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wrightandwright.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wrightandwright.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.