Skip to main content

Security report for worlded.org

JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. · Education · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to improving health and education outcomes globally. Their World Education initiative focuses on advancing learning through local partnerships and sustainable solutions, leveraging digital learning, AI, and workforce development to broaden opportunities for youth and adults. The organization demonstrates a strong market position with over 70 years of experience and a comprehensive portfolio of education-related services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries and SEO tools such as Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and performs moderately well, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses appropriate referrer policies, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. While no critical vulnerabilities were detected, recommendations include enhancing security headers and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen security posture. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and compliant digital presence with strong business credibility. The absence of WHOIS registrant data is mitigated by the organization's transparency and detailed policies. Strategic improvements in security and incident response visibility would further enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching worlded.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JSI operates in the education and non-profit sectors, targeting educators, institutions, and communities worldwide. Their business model centers on delivering education and health program services, supported by partnerships and grants. The organization leverages digital and AI technologies to meet evolving skill demands, positioning itself as a leader in workforce development and lifelong learning. Their extensive content, testimonials, and policy disclosures indicate a mature and transparent operation with a broad partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent mergers and expanded capacity to deliver programs at scale. The company maintains a strong brand consistency and market presence, supported by a professional website and active social media channels. Revenue streams likely include government and private grants, consulting services, and training programs. The organization’s strategic focus on scalable, community-driven solutions aligns with global education and workforce trends.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and referrer policies applied to embedded content. Cookie consent and privacy policies demonstrate compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a published vulnerability disclosure policy and limited incident response contact information suggest areas for improvement. The site would benefit from additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and enhanced monitoring of third-party scripts. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity and data protection but could be strengthened to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy and other advanced security headers to mitigate XSS and clickjacking risks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts and channels on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  5. Continue to monitor and improve privacy compliance, including data retention and user consent management.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.
Description
JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. (JSI) is dedicated to improving lives through better health and education outcomes for individuals and communities and to providing an environment where people of passion can pursue this cause. World Education, a JSI initiative, advances learning worldwide through strong local partnerships and sustainable, community-driven solutions.
Key services
Lifelong learning, Digital learning, AI for learning and work, Education systems strengthening, Workforce development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Slick Carousel, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Divi Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Referrer policy set on embedded iframes
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented
  3. Strong focus on education and workforce development
  4. Good implementation of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on this page
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, supported by JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel. SEO is optimized with Yoast SEO Premium, and analytics are managed via Google Tag Manager. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile responsive with good accessibility features. Technical debt appears low, with modern frameworks and plugins in use. Opportunities exist to improve performance through further optimization and to enhance security configurations. The infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence aligned with the organization's mission.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with worlded.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review worlded.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.