Skip to main content

Security report for wissenschaftsverbund.org

Wissenschaftsverbund Vierländerregion Bodensee EVTZmbH · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Wissenschaftsverbund Vierländerregion Bodensee EVTZmbH is a collaborative consortium of 25 universities and higher education institutions across the Bodensee four-country region. It focuses on fostering research, teaching, university development, and knowledge transfer to address regional and cross-border challenges. The organization positions itself as the largest cross-university network in Europe for this region, targeting academics, researchers, students, and regional stakeholders. Their business model is non-profit, emphasizing cooperation and regional development through thematic programs and project support. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Fancybox, and Tippy.js for enhanced user experience. Hosting is likely provided by Webflow's CDN infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The site implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent with an opt-in mechanism and uses Google Analytics for visitor insights. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs secure third-party libraries. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security or incident response policies, which could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is incomplete, lacking registrar and registrant details, which slightly reduces trust but is not uncommon for privacy reasons. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving its educational and collaborative mission effectively. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving WHOIS transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wissenschaftsverbund.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as a leading academic consortium in the Bodensee region, leveraging cross-border cooperation among diverse higher education institutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive network of 25 member universities and its focus on thematic programs addressing societal challenges such as sustainability, social cohesion, and talent development. Revenue streams are likely based on public funding and grants, typical for non-profit educational consortia. The target customer segments include researchers, students, academic staff, and regional partners in government and industry. Growth indicators include expanding program offerings and increasing project collaborations. The partnership ecosystem is robust, with dedicated project portals and digital tools supporting cooperation. Operationally, the organization demonstrates maturity with clear governance and communication channels.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure use of third-party libraries. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy documentation is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were observed in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is incomplete, which may indicate privacy protection but reduces transparency. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the organization's profile but can be improved with additional controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency if possible to enhance domain trustworthiness and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Wissenschaftsverbund Vierländerregion Bodensee EVTZmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wissenschaftsverbund Vierländerregion Bodensee EVTZmbH
Description
Verbund von 25 Universitäten und Hochschulen in der Vierländerregion, engagiert in Forschung, Lehre, Hochschulentwicklung und Transfer.
Key services
Consulting and networking for researchers and practitioners, Competence strengthening, Project funding and support, Program management in thematic areas
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, Fancybox 3.5.7, Tippy.js 5, Popper.js 1, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German with some English navigation option.
  3. Strong focus on regional academic collaboration and research.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in mechanism.
  5. No phone numbers found; only email contact provided.
  6. No explicit terms of service page found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Webflow CMS.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Fancybox, Tippy.js, and Popper.js for UI enhancements. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, integrated with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting the organization's digital presence effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wissenschaftsverbund.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wissenschaftsverbund.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.