Skip to main content

Security report for williamjones.lv

William Jones · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

William Jones is a Latvian-based language center specializing in English language training for both businesses and private individuals. The company offers a variety of learning formats including online and in-person classes, group and individual sessions, and exam preparation. Their market position is that of a small but professional educational provider with native-speaking instructors and tailored learning programs. The website is multilingual, primarily targeting Latvian speakers but also offering content in English, Russian, Estonian, and German. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and modern frontend libraries, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements are recommended in security headers and cookie consent for GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-suited for its educational business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching williamjones.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets both corporate clients and private learners, offering customized English language courses that address business-specific needs and personal language development. Their competitive advantage lies in native-speaking instructors and flexible learning options. Revenue streams likely include course fees for individual and group lessons, as well as specialized exam preparation services. The presence of testimonials and a privacy policy enhances credibility. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded around 2017, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The website's multilingual support indicates an intent to reach a broader Baltic and European audience. The business ecosystem includes online form providers and analytics services but no direct partner or subsidiary domains were identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a GDPR compliance gap. No incident response or security policy information is published. The site uses Gravity Forms for data collection, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, cookie consent, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits of forms and third-party integrations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
William Jones
Description
Angļu valodas apmācība uzņēmumiem un privātpersonām. Mēs izvēlamies labākās apmācību metodes praktiskai Angļu valodas apguvei.
Key services
Angļu valodas apmācība uzņēmumiem, Angļu valodas apmācība privātpersonām, Tiešsaistes un klātienes nodarbības, Grupu un individuālas nodarbības, Eksāmenu sagatavošana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.3, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Gravity Forms, Slick Slider, Typekit Fonts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Gravity Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and modern frontend libraries.
  3. Includes multiple language options and localized content.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Privacy policy is present and linked in footer.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain legitimacy cannot be fully verified.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Testimonials and business descriptions support trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.3 with jQuery and several JavaScript libraries such as Slick Slider and Typekit fonts. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking user behavior. The site uses Gravity Forms for form handling, including a newsletter signup form collecting email addresses. The site is multilingual with hreflang tags for Latvian, English, Russian, Estonian, and German. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with williamjones.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review williamjones.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.