Skip to main content

Security report for widgetlogic.org

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Widget Logic is a recently launched WordPress plugin designed to provide advanced control over widget and Gutenberg block visibility using WordPress conditional tags and PHP code. The website presents a clear and focused description of the plugin's features, targeting WordPress site administrators and developers seeking flexible widget management solutions. The business model is based on free plugin distribution, supported by user testimonials that enhance credibility. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, Animate.css, and Google Analytics for tracking. It is hosted with DNS managed by Cloudflare and registered via NameCheap. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no blocking or WAF detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but does not implement DNSSEC or security headers such as CSP or HSTS. The plugin's use of eval() for widget logic introduces potential security risks if misused. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, nor incident response contacts, which impacts privacy compliance and security posture. Google Analytics is used without a consent mechanism, raising privacy concerns. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance improvements, and clearer business information to increase trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of widgetlogic.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching widgetlogic.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Widget Logic occupies a niche in the WordPress ecosystem by offering granular control over widget and block visibility, appealing primarily to WordPress developers and site administrators. Its free distribution model suggests reliance on community adoption and potential future monetization or support services. The plugin's recent update and active maintenance indicate growth potential. The absence of social media presence or broader business information limits visibility into partnerships or revenue streams. The website's clear feature set and user testimonials provide competitive advantages in usability and trust within its target segment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers weakens its defense against common web attacks. The plugin's reliance on eval() for executing user-provided PHP code poses a significant security risk if widget editing permissions are not tightly controlled. Lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts further reduces preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent or privacy policy, potentially exposing the site to regulatory risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Introduce a security policy page and provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Review and restrict the use of eval() in plugin code to prevent potential code injection vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Widget Logic is a WordPress plugin that allows users to control the visibility of widgets and Gutenberg blocks on pages, posts, and categories using WordPress Conditional Tags or custom PHP code.
Key services
Widget visibility management, Gutenberg block control, User login state based visibility, Load logic timing control
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Animate.css, Lineicons, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to a single email address; no phone or physical address provided.
  4. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  5. Eval() usage in plugin logic poses potential security risks if misused by users.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. Content is focused on a free WordPress plugin with clear descriptions and user testimonials.
  8. No social media links or additional business verification information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a front-end leveraging Bootstrap and Animate.css for responsive and animated UI elements. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking, though without visible consent mechanisms. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing reliable DNS services but without DNSSEC enabled. The site loads external scripts asynchronously, improving performance. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 +3Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 59/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with widgetlogic.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review widgetlogic.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.