Skip to main content

Security report for facescored.com

FaceScored · Technology

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Email security.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FaceScored is a small technology company offering a free AI-powered face rating tool that analyzes facial geometry locally in the user's browser to ensure privacy. The service provides a freemium business model where users can get a free overall score and pay for detailed reports. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, with MediaPipe for facial landmark detection. Privacy is a core feature, as photos are never uploaded to servers. However, the site lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, terms of service, and incident response information, which are important for compliance and trust. Security posture is good with HTTPS and local processing, but could be improved with security headers and published policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.facescored.com, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.facescored.com, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@facescored.com" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching facescored.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
68
Email security
72
DNS health
94
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
85
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention facescored.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for facescored.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FaceScored occupies a niche market in AI-based facial attractiveness scoring with a focus on privacy and transparency. Its freemium model targets general users interested in facial analysis without requiring accounts or uploads, reducing barriers to use. The company leverages advanced facial landmark technology and provides clear explanations of its scoring formula, enhancing user trust. The absence of social media presence and limited contact information suggests a small, focused operation. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is consistent with the privacy-centric business model. The company could expand market reach by adding more business information and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and on-device image processing to protect user data. No security headers were detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which are gaps in security maturity. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also presents compliance risks, especially under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The security score is good but could be improved by adding formal policies, security headers, and a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and display terms of service to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer (DPO) contact information to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FaceScored
Description
A free, private AI face rating tool that measures facial geometry in your browser.
Key services
AI face rating based on facial geometry, On-device photo analysis, Detailed paid reports with percentiles and notes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, MediaPipe (facial landmark detection), JavaScript, WebAssembly (likely for on-device processing)
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web browser
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No photo upload to server; processing done locally
  • No account required, reducing data collection risks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Umami Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics, Umami Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a free AI face rating tool with local processing for privacy
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  3. No terms of service or security policy published
  4. Contact email support@facescored.com is provided
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  6. No social media links detected
  7. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  8. No signs of malicious or adult content
  9. Minimal external dependencies, mainly analytics scripts
  10. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with MediaPipe for facial landmark detection running entirely on the client side. This architecture supports privacy and performance by avoiding server-side image uploads. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible with good SEO practices. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Analytics are implemented via privacy-focused services (Plausible and Umami), indicating a minimal tracking approach. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, with opportunities to improve security headers and formalize compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with facescored.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review facescored.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.