Mojeek · Technology · United Kingdom
Low risk. No critical or high findings.
Mojeek is a UK-based alternative web search engine emphasizing privacy and unbiased search results. It offers a variety of search services including web, image, and news search, along with a search API and advertising platform. The business model relies on community and partner support, positioning itself as a privacy-focused alternative to mainstream search engines. The website content is well-structured, professionally designed, and optimized for mobile devices, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. While the performance is moderate and mobile optimization is good, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers implementation. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The site avoids tracking and analytics scripts, aligning with its privacy-centric ethos. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is noted despite the privacy focus. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting the legitimacy of the domain and business. Overall, Mojeek presents a trustworthy and privacy-respecting search engine platform with a solid business foundation. Strategic improvements in security policies, cookie consent, and security headers would enhance its security posture and compliance standing.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Without HSTS, a visitor who types the address or follows an http:// link makes a first request over plain HTTP, which an attacker on the same network can intercept and keep unencrypted (SSL stripping).
What to do: Send "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" on HTTPS responses once every subdomain works over HTTPS (use max-age=31536000 alone otherwise).
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
The SPF record ends in "?all" (or has no "all"), so mail from unlisted servers gets a neutral result and SPF gives no protection against spoofing.
What to do: End the record with "-all", or "~all" while you confirm every sender is listed.
The DMARC policy is p=none, so mail that fails authentication is still delivered; the record only collects reports.
What to do: Review the aggregate reports, then move to p=quarantine and finally p=reject.
Outdated scripts and CMS versions are how most small-business sites get compromised; a security.txt file tells researchers where to report what they find.
jquery 3.2.1 (loaded from https://www.mojeek.com/js/vendor/jquery-3.2.1.min.js?v=1.264) has 3 published vulnerabilities: CVE-2019-11358, GHSA-6c3j-c64m-qhgq, CVE-2020-11023, GHSA-jpcq-cgw6-v4j6, CVE-2020-11022, GHSA-gxr4-xjj5-5px2.
What to do: Upgrade jquery to 3.5.0 or later and retest the pages that use it.
This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention mojeek.com, from OffSeq Breach.
3 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mojeek.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with mojeek.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mojeek.com.