Skip to main content

Security report for widgetlogic.org

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Widget Logic is a recently launched WordPress plugin website focused on providing users with granular control over widget and Gutenberg block visibility using WordPress conditional tags and PHP code. The site targets WordPress administrators and developers seeking flexible widget management solutions. The business model is currently free distribution with potential for future monetization. The website is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, leveraging modern technologies such as Bootstrap and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security at the infrastructure level. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, but lacks important security headers and published security policies. The plugin itself uses eval() on user input, which is a significant security risk if widget editors are not trusted. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Analytics tracking is implemented via Google Tag Manager, but no explicit user consent mechanisms are detected. Overall, the website is functional and credible for its niche but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and user guidance on plugin risks. The domain registration is consistent with a new product launch and shows no suspicious patterns. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and providing clear security and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching widgetlogic.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Widget Logic occupies a niche in the WordPress plugin ecosystem, offering advanced widget and block visibility control. Its competitive advantage lies in flexibility through PHP code usage, appealing to technically skilled users. The free business model facilitates adoption but may limit immediate revenue. The target customers are WordPress site owners and developers needing granular control over widget display. The presence of user testimonials indicates positive user reception and community trust. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with no detected related domains or partners. Growth potential exists through feature expansion and possible premium offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer restrictions in place. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options weakens its defense against common web attacks. The plugin's use of eval() on user input is a critical security concern that could lead to code injection vulnerabilities if misused. No incident response or security policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements to protect users and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide clear warnings and documentation about the security risks of using eval() in the plugin and consider safer alternatives or input sanitization.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Widget Logic is a WordPress plugin that allows users to control the visibility of widgets and Gutenberg blocks on different pages, posts, and categories using WordPress Conditional Tags or custom PHP code.
Key services
Widget visibility management, Gutenberg block control, User login state based visibility, Load logic timing control
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Animate.css, Lineicons, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
WordPress plugin ecosystem
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a dedicated landing page for a WordPress plugin called Widget Logic
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact email is provided but no phone or physical address
  4. No security or incident response policies published
  5. Website uses eval() in plugin logic which poses security risks if misused
  6. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics tracking
  7. Domain is very new but consistent with a new product launch
  8. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Animate.css for animations, and Lineicons for iconography. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, providing performance and security benefits. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear with smooth scrolling. However, no accessibility features beyond basic HTML semantics are evident. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization techniques detected. The site lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications but is clearly targeted at WordPress users as a plugin landing page.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 +3Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 59/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with widgetlogic.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review widgetlogic.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.