Skip to main content

Security report for wf3.fr

WebForce3 · Education · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebForce3 is an educational initiative focused on digital skills training that began in 2014 and has recently ended its operations. The website serves primarily as a closure announcement, thanking stakeholders and directing future learners to partner educational institutions. The site is hosted on the Carrd.co platform and uses standard web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is minimal with no advanced headers or policies detected, and privacy compliance is lacking due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is safe and trustworthy but limited in content and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wf3.fr

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wf3.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
179
Employees
0
Customers
159
Third parties
20
Weak passwords
9%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for wf3.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WebForce3 positioned itself as a medium-sized educational provider in the digital skills sector in France. Its business model centered on training and education with partnerships to ensure continuity for learners after closure. The website reflects a transparent communication strategy about the end of the initiative and promotes other educational options. The lack of direct contact information and policies suggests a wind-down phase rather than active business operations. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized French digital education institutions, enhancing credibility.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low, with no detected security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response information. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from the URL) but lacks additional security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not demonstrated. Overall, the security posture is minimal and could be improved with standard security headers, privacy policies, and contact channels for incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails or forms for user support and incident reporting.
  4. Ensure HTTPS is enforced with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site usage and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WebForce3
Description
WebForce3 was an educational initiative started in 2014 focused on digital and technology training. The website announces the end of the WebForce3 adventure and thanks learners, collaborators, partners, and other stakeholders. It also directs future learners to other digital schools such as GRANDE ECOLE DU NUMERIQUE and mentions partner schools continuing learner pathways.
Key services
Digital skills training, Educational programs in technology
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Platforms
Carrd.co
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an informational closure notice for an educational initiative.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or forms present.
  4. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Content is minimal but clear and consistent with business closure message.
  7. Hosted on Carrd.co platform with standard technologies.
  8. No signs of malicious or adult content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Carrd.co platform using standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It loads Google Fonts for typography and uses inline CSS for styling. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. No CMS beyond Carrd is detected. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or external dependencies beyond fonts. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The technical implementation is straightforward but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wf3.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wf3.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.