Skip to main content

Security report for websketch.lv

Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website websketch.lv is a professional web development service provider targeting businesses primarily in Latvia. The site offers website creation and design services, positioning itself as a local expert in business web solutions. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with optimization plugins such as WP Rocket, and uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons. The site is well-structured with SEO best practices including hreflang tags for multilingual support. However, the absence of visible privacy policies, terms of service, and contact information limits the site's transparency and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with no explicit security headers detected and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and contact disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching websketch.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Websketch.lv operates as a small-sized technology service provider specializing in professional website development for businesses. Its market positioning is local/regional within Latvia, targeting companies seeking tailored web solutions. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on custom web design and development. The website content and structure indicate a focus on quality and user experience, with multilingual support for Latvian, Russian, and English audiences. The company does not publicly disclose detailed business registration or certification information, which could be improved to enhance credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. Marketing tools include Google Tag Manager and cookie consent management, indicating awareness of digital marketing and compliance requirements.

Security posture

The security posture of websketch.lv is moderate but lacks several best practices. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external resource URLs), but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML content. There is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure information, which are important for handling security incidents and building trust. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes, indicating some compliance with privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to verify domain registration legitimacy, which is a security consideration. Overall, the site should improve transparency and implement additional security headers and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add clear and verified business contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  3. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and consistent with website business information to improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Professional website development services for businesses.
Key services
Website development, Web design, Business web solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Roboto), FontAwesome, WordPress, WP Rocket
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder (Visual Composer)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or registration dates extracted.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with WP Rocket optimization plugin.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism present via CookieYes script.
  5. No visible privacy policy, terms of service, or contact information found on the homepage HTML.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit business contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  8. Website content is professional and targeted at Latvian businesses needing web development.
  9. SEO optimization appears good with meta tags and hreflang links for Latvian, Russian, and English.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Salient theme and WPBakery Page Builder, with WP Rocket for performance optimization. It uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. External resources include Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons. The site is multilingual with hreflang tags for Latvian, Russian, and English. Performance is moderate with deferred and lazy-loaded scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA and semantic HTML elements but could be improved. SEO is good with meta tags and structured data absent or minimal. No hosting provider or server details were identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with websketch.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review websketch.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.