Skip to main content

Security report for webriti.com

Webriti · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webriti is a small technology company specializing in the development and sale of premium WordPress themes and plugins. Established in 2011, the company targets artists, bloggers, and business professionals seeking responsive and flexible website themes. Their market position is that of a niche provider with a focus on quality and customer support, as evidenced by testimonials and a range of theme offerings including installation services and plugins. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and Elementor, leveraging popular plugins like Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Analytics for tracking, though it lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare and PublicDomainRegistry.com, with SSL enabled ensuring secure connections. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are absent, representing areas for improvement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and contact information is limited to a contact form without direct emails or phone numbers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent. Overall, Webriti presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with good technical implementation and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and privacy compliance would enhance their security posture and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webriti.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webriti operates in the WordPress theme and plugin market, focusing on premium responsive themes for creatives and professionals. Their competitive advantage lies in offering easy-to-customize, mobile-friendly themes with free support. Revenue streams likely include theme sales, plugin sales, installation services, and affiliate programs. The company maintains partnerships with plugin providers and support platforms, enhancing their ecosystem. Growth indicators include a long-established domain and active content updates. The business model is direct-to-customer via their website, supported by testimonials and a modest but consistent content strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, limiting transparency. The use of popular WordPress plugins and frameworks suggests a standard security baseline but requires ongoing patching and monitoring. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms despite analytics usage. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations given the use of Google Analytics.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webriti
Description
We develop premium Wordpress. All of our themes are responsive, flexible and powerful.
Key services
Premium WordPress themes, WordPress theme installation service, WordPress plugins (SEO Optimized Images, Easy Coming Soon Pro), Support and help articles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO, Elementor, Contact Form 7, Elementskit Lite, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins not detected explicitly

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based theme and plugin provider with a focus on premium responsive themes.
  2. Content is professionally presented with testimonials and clear navigation.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of Google Analytics.
  5. Security headers are not explicitly present; DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with consistent registration details.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and SEO plugins indicates good digital maturity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, Elementor for page building, and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The site uses Contact Form 7 for form handling and Elementskit Lite for widget enhancements. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is excellent, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS with SSL enabled, ensuring secure connections. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved with enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webriti.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webriti.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.