Skip to main content

Security report for webone.lv

Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webone.lv is a small international web development company based in Latvia, specializing in website creation, SEO optimization, e-commerce development, and video projection services. Their business model focuses on delivering tailored web solutions to help clients grow their businesses. The website demonstrates a good level of technical maturity with modern frontend technologies, responsive design, and integration of analytics tools. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as security headers, indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The site is accessible without any WAF or blocking mechanisms, and contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the company presents itself professionally but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webone.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webone.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
42
Employees
4
Customers
22
Third parties
16
Weak passwords
19%

Latest record dated 2025-08-15 · 14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for webone.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –delivery.webone.lv2025-08-15
  • –trawel.webone.lv2025-07-20
  • –booking.webone.lv2025-04-14
  • –social.webone.lv2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets business clients seeking web solutions, positioning itself as a niche provider with a focus on quality and individual client approach. Their portfolio and team presentation support trust and professionalism. The business appears to be relatively young (founded circa 2016) and small in size. The use of social media and analytics indicates an awareness of digital marketing practices. Lack of WHOIS data limits deeper trust analysis, but no suspicious indicators are present on the site. The company’s services align with technology sector standards, focusing on web and digital media solutions.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and integrates Google Analytics and Cloudflare Insights, suggesting basic security hygiene. However, no HTTP security headers were detected in the HTML content, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Forms exist but lack visible security features such as CSRF tokens or explicit input validation notices. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also represents a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, formal privacy documentation, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Enhance form security with anti-CSRF tokens and input validation mechanisms.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Starptautisks uzņēmums, kas specializējas mājas lapu izstrādē, optimizācijā, interneta veikalu izstrādē un video projekciju pakalpojumos. Mērķis ir attīstīt un augt klientu biznesus ar individuālu pieeju un kvalitatīvu izpildi.
Key services
Mājas lapu izstrāde, Mājas lapu optimizācija (SEO), Interneta veikalu izstrāde, Video projekciju pakalpojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Google Maps API, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Analytics and Google Maps usage)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
AddThis, Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
AddThis social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site.
  4. Contact information is complete and includes physical address, phone, email, and contact form.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies and includes analytics and tracking scripts.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present.
  8. Content is business-focused, safe, and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook and Twitter links.
  10. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Bootstrap framework. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Maps APIs for tracking and location services. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, there is no CMS detected, suggesting a custom or static site. The hosting provider is not identifiable from the content. The site uses Cloudflare Insights for performance monitoring but lacks advanced security configurations visible in the HTML. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webone.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webone.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.