Skip to main content

Security report for webob.org

Pylons Project · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebOb is an established open source Python library project under the Pylons Project umbrella, providing WSGI request and response object wrappers to simplify web application development. The project targets Python developers and middleware authors, with a strong reputation evidenced by its use in notable frameworks such as Pyramid and TurboGears. The website serves primarily as an informational and documentation hub, linking to source code repositories, bug trackers, and download locations. Technically, the website uses a simple stack including Bootstrap CSS and jQuery 1.8, with hosting and DNS registration managed via Cloudflare. The site is moderately optimized for performance and accessibility but lacks advanced mobile optimization and SEO features. No CMS is detected, indicating a static or custom-built site. From a security perspective, the domain is well-registered with consistent WHOIS data and a long registration history, indicating legitimacy. However, the website lacks visible security headers, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which are important for compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing risk but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance documentation, and improved technical modernization to strengthen its posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webob.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webob.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for webob.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WebOb occupies a niche in the Python web development ecosystem as a foundational library for WSGI applications and middleware. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive HTTP specification mapping and zero external dependencies, making it a reliable choice for developers. The project operates under the non-profit Pylons Project, focusing on open source community-driven development rather than direct revenue generation. Its target customers are developers and organizations building Python web applications, including large platforms like OpenStack and Google App Engine. The presence of sponsorship from Linode indicates some commercial ecosystem support. Growth indicators include active GitHub repositories and ongoing releases. The partnership ecosystem includes major open source frameworks and cloud platforms, enhancing its market position.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The domain registration is transparent and consistent, which is a positive trust factor. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap for security transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and similar regulations, which could pose legal risks. The site does not collect user data, mitigating some risk, but also limits user trust signals. Overall, the security culture appears basic and could be improved by adopting modern security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to broaden user reach and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pylons Project
Description
WebOb is a Python library providing wrappers around the WSGI request environment and response objects, facilitating HTTP behavior handling for Python web applications and middleware. It is a project under the Pylons Project.
Key services
WSGI request and response object wrappers, HTTP header parsing, Content negotiation, Middleware facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Python, WSGI, jQuery 1.8, Bootstrap CSS
Frameworks
Pylons Project
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set
  • No external dependencies in code

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an open source project page for WebOb Python library.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. External links mostly to trusted developer and documentation resources.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Twitter widget.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations visible in HTML.
  8. Domain registered with Cloudflare registrar, DNSSEC not enabled.
  9. Content is technical and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a minimal technology stack with Bootstrap for styling and jQuery 1.8 for scripting, which is outdated and could be modernized. Hosting and DNS registration are managed by Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure but no evidence of advanced CDN or security features enabled. The site lacks a CMS, indicating a static or custom-built site, which reduces complexity but may limit scalability. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques detected. SEO and accessibility features are basic, suggesting room for improvement. No analytics or tracking services are detected beyond a Twitter widget, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webob.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webob.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.