Skip to main content

Security report for webmediaproz.com

WebMediaProz · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebMediaProz is a small technology service provider specializing in online marketing and digital business growth solutions with over 15 years of experience. The website presents basic content describing their services and contact options but lacks detailed business or compliance information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Customizr theme and common JavaScript libraries, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy policies, which reduces compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, impacting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency to enhance credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webmediaproz.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses seeking online marketing and digital growth services globally. Its business model is service-oriented, leveraging over 15 years of experience. The website's limited content and lack of detailed business information suggest a small-scale operation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers may hinder customer engagement. The site does not display certifications or trust badges, which could improve market positioning. The use of WordPress and Customizr theme indicates a standard approach to web presence without advanced customization or integrations.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are best practices to mitigate common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies is found. The site does not implement privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting business intelligence. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risks. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide explicit company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve transparency and customer confidence.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and SEO performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WebMediaProz
Description
WebMediaProz offers global services and solutions to help grow online businesses with over 15 years of experience in online marketing.
Key services
Online marketing, Digital business growth solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Modernizr, Fancybox, Underscore.js, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, Customizr theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is limited to contact/support pages without explicit emails or phone numbers.
  4. Site uses WordPress CMS with Customizr theme and common JS libraries.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active domain.
  7. No visible security or compliance certifications.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Site content is basic with limited textual content and minimal business details.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Customizr theme, incorporating JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Modernizr, Fancybox, and Underscore.js. The site loads Google Fonts and uses standard CSS styles. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and parallax effects. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with no advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata detected. No analytics or tracking tools are integrated. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. The site lacks advanced security configurations and modern compliance features, indicating technical debt and opportunities for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webmediaproz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webmediaproz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.