Skip to main content

Security report for webbuilding.lv

webbuilding.lv · Technology · Latvia

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

89/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

webbuilding.lv is a Latvian-based small technology service provider specializing in website development, e-commerce solutions, mobile application development, graphic design, and SEO services. With over 13 years of experience, the company targets businesses and individuals seeking professional digital presence and marketing solutions. The website demonstrates a professional design with good SEO practices and structured data implementation, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The technical stack includes Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Google Ads, supporting marketing and analytics efforts. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie policy and consent mechanism present but no dedicated privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though improvements in privacy and security documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
80/ 100 · Low
GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 3 analytics or marketing cookies: Google (_gcl_au); Google Analytics (_ga_M8BB8730XL, _ga). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webbuilding.lv

This scan found 12 issues across 7 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
77
Email security
91
DNS health
97
Network security
95
Website hygiene
85
GDPR outside view
80
Average
89

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webbuilding.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for webbuilding.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital services such as web and mobile development and SEO. Its market position appears to be that of a local, experienced service provider in Latvia, leveraging a service-based business model. The website content and metadata emphasize experience and a broad service portfolio, targeting SMEs and individual clients. The use of Google marketing tools suggests active customer acquisition strategies. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The business model relies on service delivery rather than product sales, with key revenue streams likely from project-based contracts and ongoing SEO services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading of analytics scripts, which is positive for security and performance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which are important for compliance and trust. The contact information is available but lacks dedicated security contact channels. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention policies to align with GDPR and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
webbuilding.lv
Description
Mājaslapu izstrāde, interneta veikalu izstrāde, mobilo aplikāciju izveide, grafiskais dizains un SEO pakalpojumi! 13 gadu pieredze!
Key services
Website development, E-commerce development, Mobile application development, Graphic design, SEO services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, JSON-LD structured data, Web fonts (woff2), CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of async loading for analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Professional and consistent branding and content
  3. Good use of SEO and structured data
  4. Contact information is present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  5. Use of Google analytics and ads scripts indicates marketing efforts
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including CSS3, JavaScript, web fonts, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading improving load times. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified from the HTML content. The site uses a custom or proprietary platform with well-structured CSS and JavaScript. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO further and enhance accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webbuilding.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webbuilding.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.