Skip to main content

Security report for webaula.fi

Webaula Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webaula Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in WordPress website development, digital marketing, and analytics services. Established in 2012 and based in Vaasa, Finland, the company has completed over 450 projects, positioning itself as a reputable local service provider. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking tailored WordPress solutions and digital marketing expertise. The company leverages modern web technologies and popular analytics tools to deliver optimized digital experiences. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Understrap theme and Elementor page builder, integrating multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Crisp Chat. Hosting appears to be managed by Cloud City Oy, consistent with the domain registrar and nameservers. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance, although accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly present, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business information, supporting the legitimacy of the domain. Overall, Webaula Oy presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a solid technical foundation and compliance posture. Strategic enhancements in security headers, privacy policy visibility, and accessibility would further strengthen their digital maturity and risk management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webaula.fi

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webaula.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
20
Employees
0
Customers
15
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
5%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for webaula.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webaula Oy operates in the technology sector, focusing on WordPress web development and digital marketing services. Their business model centers on project-based service delivery to local and regional clients, leveraging expertise in WordPress and analytics. The company benefits from a strong portfolio of over 450 projects, indicating market acceptance and operational experience. Their partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major analytics and marketing platforms, enhancing service offerings. The absence of privacy policy and terms of service pages in the visible content suggests an opportunity to improve transparency and compliance. Growth indicators include active use of modern marketing tools and social media engagement. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional content, supporting credibility in a competitive market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements. The lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed credentials were found. The use of reputable third-party services for analytics and chat suggests reliance on secure external platforms. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could impact readiness and transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology service provider but would benefit from enhanced header implementation, regular security audits, and formalized incident response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure process to facilitate responsible reporting and incident management.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Conduct periodic security assessments and update all WordPress components regularly to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
WebAula Oy
Registration number
2543065-6
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webaula Oy
Description
Webaula on Vaasassa toimiva WordPress-toimisto, jo yli 450 projektin kokemuksella. WordPress verkkosivut, digimarkkinointi ja analytiikka.
Key services
WordPress website development, Digital marketing, Analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Quantcast, Albacross, Crisp Chat, Owl Carousel, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Understrap WordPress theme, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Quantcast
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Albacross, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Quantcast
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Quantcast, Albacross, Crisp Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Uses modern WordPress technology stack with popular plugins and analytics tools
  3. Implements cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content
  5. Contact information includes physical address and contact form but no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML
  6. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection
  7. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using the Understrap theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a flexible and widely supported platform. Integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Quantcast reflects a mature digital marketing approach. Hosting is managed by Cloud City Oy, consistent with the registrar and DNS configuration. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Some technical debt is suggested by missing security headers and basic accessibility implementation. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve compliance documentation to reduce technical risks and enhance operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webaula.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webaula.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.