Skip to main content

Security report for wargame.lv

Technology · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WARGAME.LV is a minimalistic website focused on wargaming or gaming-related content, featuring visual branding and links to a related arena subdomain. The site lacks textual business descriptions, contact information, and compliance policies, limiting its transparency and trustworthiness. Technically, it uses standard frontend libraries such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Popper.js, but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, and security features. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the website presents a basic digital presence with room for significant improvements in content, security, and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wargame.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets gaming enthusiasts, likely focusing on wargaming communities. Its business model and market position are unclear due to minimal content and lack of business information. The presence of a partner subdomain (arena.wargame.lv) suggests an ecosystem or platform for gaming events or arenas. No revenue streams, partnerships, or certifications are evident. The site appears to be small scale with limited digital maturity and no visible marketing or analytics tools.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to lack of visible HTTPS enforcement details, absence of security headers, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No forms or data collection reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The missing privacy and cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The WHOIS data unavailability further complicates trust assessment. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, security headers, and compliance documentation to enhance security and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for support and incident response.
  5. Enhance SEO, accessibility, and content quality to improve user experience and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
WARGAME.LV appears to be a website related to wargaming or gaming activities, featuring logos and links to an arena subdomain. The site content is minimal and primarily visual with no textual business description.
Key services
wargame.lv main site, arena.wargame.lv subsite
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.1.3, jQuery 3.3.1 slim, Popper.js 1.14.3
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is minimalistic with mostly visual content and no textual business or contact information.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. Uses common frontend libraries (Bootstrap, jQuery, Popper.js) loaded from reputable CDNs.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
  8. No evidence of WAF or security blocking mechanisms.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 4.1.3, jQuery 3.3.1 slim, and Popper.js 1.14.3 loaded from reputable CDNs, indicating a standard frontend technology stack. The HTML is valid and includes responsive design elements. However, SEO optimization is poor with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Accessibility features are basic, and no CMS or backend technologies are detected. Hosting provider and SSL details are not available. Performance is moderate given the lightweight content. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve SEO, and add backend capabilities for richer content and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wargame.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wargame.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.