Skip to main content

Security report for walmeric.com

Walmeric · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Walmeric is a technology company specializing in transforming potential customers into real revenue through omnichannel assisted sales management and conversion enhancement. It holds a strong market position as a chosen global provider by Google for call detail forwarding and offers a suite of solutions including digital channel traceability, lead management, data consolidation, analytics, lead nurturing, and AI automation. The company is part of Globant and targets businesses seeking to optimize their sales and marketing performance. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like React and Next.js, integrating with major platforms such as Google Ads, Meta, Adobe Campaign, and Salesforce. However, the website suffers from a critical security weakness due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts its security posture. Privacy and legal compliance are well addressed with comprehensive policies and GDPR indicators. Overall, the website demonstrates excellent content quality and business credibility but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching walmeric.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Walmeric operates in the technology sector with a focus on lead management and sales optimization across multiple industries including telecommunications, insurance, energy, education, finance, automotive, tourism, and retail. The company leverages advanced AI and BI technologies to provide real-time analytics, lead scoring, and omnichannel communication solutions. Its business model is B2B SaaS and technology services, supported by strategic partnerships with major platforms like Google and Meta. The company has a medium size with a history dating back to 2007 and is a subsidiary of Globant. Walmeric's competitive advantages include its integration capabilities, AI-driven automation, and recognized certifications. The website content reflects a professional and consistent brand image with strong trust signals such as client success stories and certifications.

Security posture

The current security posture of Walmeric's website is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and critical security headers like HSTS are missing. While SPF and DMARC records are properly configured for email security, the website lacks OCSP stapling and session resumption features. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or incident response contact channels. The absence of these security measures poses a significant risk to user data confidentiality and integrity. Immediate remediation is required to install a valid SSL certificate, enable HTTPS, and implement recommended security headers and protocols to align with best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Configure session resumption mechanisms such as session tickets or session cache.
  6. Correct and specify valid CAA records to restrict certificate authorities authorized to issue certificates.
  7. Establish a public vulnerability disclosure policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  8. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  9. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  10. Regularly audit and update privacy and security policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering and client-side hydration for performance and SEO benefits. It integrates with multiple third-party platforms including Google Ads, Meta, Adobe Campaign, Salesforce, and D3A Smart Workplace, indicating a mature and complex technology stack. Hosting appears to be on Vercel or a similar platform optimized for Next.js deployments. Despite the advanced tech stack, the website suffers from slow load times (over 25 seconds) and a large page size (~469 KB), which could impact user experience and SEO rankings. The absence of HTTPS and proper SSL configuration is a critical technical risk. The site includes multimedia content such as videos and interactive elements, which are well integrated but may contribute to performance overhead. There is room for improvement in accessibility and mobile optimization, although the site is generally responsive.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with walmeric.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review walmeric.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.