Skip to main content

Security report for walletconnect.com

reown inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reown Inc. is a technology company specializing in providing infrastructure and developer tools for the emerging financial internet, focusing on onchain finance applications such as DeFi, payments, and enterprise blockchain solutions. Their platform offers products like AppKit and WalletKit, enabling developers and wallet providers to integrate and scale blockchain-based financial services efficiently. Positioned as a connectivity layer, Reown supports a large ecosystem of wallets and applications, indicating a strong market presence in the blockchain infrastructure space. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted and registered via Cloudflare, and uses Sanity CMS for content management. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, with rich content and clear navigation tailored for developers and enterprise clients. Integration of HubSpot forms and Google Tag Manager indicates active marketing and analytics usage. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs several security headers, and maintains a security policy page. However, it lacks DNSSEC, explicit incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure program, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. Privacy compliance is addressed with privacy and cookie policies, though a cookie consent mechanism is absent. Overall, Reown presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically mature online presence with a strong focus on blockchain finance infrastructure. Strategic improvements in security transparency and privacy mechanisms would further strengthen their risk profile and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching walletconnect.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Reown operates in the blockchain technology sector, targeting developers, enterprises, and institutions building onchain financial applications. Their business model revolves around providing SaaS infrastructure and developer tools that simplify integration and scaling of blockchain finance apps and wallets. The company leverages partnerships with established protocols like WalletConnect, enhancing their ecosystem reach. Their content and case studies indicate a focus on compliance and user experience, positioning them competitively in the DeFi infrastructure market. The presence of enterprise solutions and a dedicated sales contact suggests a B2B revenue stream. Social media and community engagement via Discord and Farcaster reflect active ecosystem participation and growth orientation.

Security posture

Reown demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement, multiple security headers, and a dedicated security policy page. The domain is registered with Cloudflare and protected against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC is a minor vulnerability that could expose DNS spoofing risks. No public incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which limits transparency and responsiveness to security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like HubSpot and Google Tag Manager introduces potential supply chain risks, necessitating regular audits. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting DNSSEC, publishing incident response contacts, and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and integrations for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user data handling practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
reown inc.
Description
Reown gives developers the tools to build user experiences that make digital ownership effortless, intuitive, and secure. It powers secure, user-friendly, insight-rich infrastructure for growth-driven teams building onchain finance — from DeFi and payments to enterprises and institutions.
Key services
AppKit for apps, WalletKit for wallets, Onchain finance infrastructure, Analytics and scaling tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, HubSpot forms, Google Tag Manager, Sanity CMS, Video and SVG media
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Cloudflare (Registrar and DNS)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and registrar for security
  • Security page present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at developers and enterprises in blockchain finance.
  3. Strong presence of developer resources including docs, demo, and dashboard links.
  4. Social media presence is active and diverse.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via forms.
  6. Security policies are present but could be enhanced with incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and CMS.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO performance. Sanity CMS is used for content management, providing flexibility and scalability. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, offering robust infrastructure and security features. The site loads quickly, is mobile-optimized, and includes accessibility considerations. Integration with HubSpot forms and Google Tag Manager supports marketing and analytics efforts. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security with DNSSEC and to enhance privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with walletconnect.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review walletconnect.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.