Skip to main content

Security report for vxsbill.com

Virtual Access Internet BV · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Virtual Access Internet BV operates the website vxs.com, providing billing and internet hosting services primarily targeting businesses requiring payment processing and scalable hosting solutions. The company claims over 25 years of experience, supported by a domain age dating back to 1996, indicating a well-established presence in the technology and e-commerce sectors. The website content is focused on promoting their core services with a straightforward presentation but lacks comprehensive customer engagement features such as contact details or policy disclosures. From a technical perspective, the website employs standard web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and FontAwesome for icons. However, the site shows only basic mobile optimization and accessibility features, with no advanced SEO or analytics tools detected. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed beyond custom nameservers, and no CMS is identified. Security posture is moderate but could be improved. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are present in the provided data. The absence of HTTPS enforcement details and lack of published security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No forms or data collection mechanisms were found, limiting exposure but also reducing user interaction capabilities. Overall, the website is functional and presents a legitimate business with a long operational history. However, it lacks critical compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security best practices. These gaps present risks in trust and regulatory compliance that should be addressed to enhance credibility and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vxsbill.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Virtual Access Internet BV positions itself as a niche provider of payment processing and internet hosting services, targeting merchants and businesses requiring reliable e-commerce infrastructure. The company's longevity and domain age suggest stable operations and experience. The business model revolves around service provision with a focus on safe and scalable solutions. The absence of visible partnerships or subsidiaries indicates a focused, possibly small-scale operation. The use of recognized payment brand logos supports trust in payment processing capabilities. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed, limiting deeper financial insights. The lack of contact and policy transparency may hinder customer acquisition and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is basic. The domain registration includes clientTransferProhibited status, which is a positive control against domain hijacking. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, increasing risk of common web attacks. The absence of HTTPS enforcement information is a concern, though it is assumed HTTPS is used given modern standards but not confirmed. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve customer trust and support.
  5. Establish and publish security and incident response policies, including vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, to enhance transparency and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Virtual Access Internet BV
Description
VirtualXS provides innovative e-commerce solutions and high speed scalable Internet hosting. With over 25 years of experience in both fields, they offer extensive expertise and a state of the art product line.
Key services
Payment processing, Internet hosting
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (Bootstrap), JavaScript (jQuery), FontAwesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found on the homepage or linked pages
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided
  3. No forms detected on the homepage
  4. No social media links found
  5. Website uses standard libraries like jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Website content is minimal but relevant to business services
  8. No SEO or accessibility advanced features detected
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and FontAwesome for icons. The HTML structure is valid and includes basic meta tags for SEO. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal. No CMS or third-party analytics tools are detected, indicating a simple custom-built site. Hosting provider details are not explicit but custom nameservers suggest self-managed or dedicated hosting. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features that could improve user experience and search rankings. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vxsbill.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vxsbill.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.