Skip to main content

Security report for voxmate.com

Voxmate · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Voxmate is a technology company focused on delivering an all-in-one Android app designed specifically for blind and visually impaired users. Their product offers a gesture-based interface to access news, audiobooks, games, and communication tools, positioning them as an innovative player in the accessibility technology market. The company operates a subscription-based business model with free limited access and discounted early access paid plans. Their market position is that of an emerging, specialized provider with a clear target audience and strategic partnerships, notably with Sight and Sound Technology in the UK. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Angular 13, FontAwesome, and integrates third-party services such as YouTube, Wistia, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. Hosting and domain registration are managed via Amazon Registrar, indicating a reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and a professional design. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but lacking comprehensive GDPR details. The absence of explicit contact information and security disclosures suggests areas for improvement. Overall, Voxmate presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a solid business foundation and technical implementation. Strategic enhancements in security transparency, privacy compliance, and contact availability would strengthen their risk posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching voxmate.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Voxmate targets the niche market of blind and visually impaired users by providing an accessible Android app ecosystem. Their competitive advantage lies in a gesture-based interface tailored for blind-first usability, frequent app updates, and a growing ecosystem of audio-first applications. Revenue streams include subscription plans with introductory discounts for early adopters. The company leverages partnerships, such as with Sight and Sound Technology, to expand market reach, particularly in the UK. Media coverage and user testimonials indicate positive reception and growing brand recognition. The business model focuses on accessibility technology innovation with a clear customer segment and growth potential.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and cookie consent, which are foundational security and privacy practices. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers limits transparency and preparedness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating a low immediate risk. Compliance with GDPR is basic but could be improved with more detailed disclosures. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file suggests limited formal security engagement. Enhancing these areas would improve incident readiness and user confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance the privacy policy to include detailed GDPR compliance information and data retention policies.
  5. Add explicit company contact information including support and security email addresses to improve transparency and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Voxmate
Description
Voxmate is an intuitive, gesture-based, Android app for people who are blind or visually impaired. It makes news, books, games, and even dating, accessible in a completely new way.
Key services
Audio-first apps, News listening, Audiobooks, Audio games, Instant messaging, Phone calls
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 13, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, YouTube iframe API, Wistia video embedding, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
Android app ecosystem
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. Content is focused on accessibility technology for blind and visually impaired users.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and functional.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the website.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  7. Presence of user testimonials and media references enhances trust.
  8. Subscription pricing and offers clearly presented.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and Telegram.
  10. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Angular framework (version 13) with integration of popular libraries such as FontAwesome for icons and Google Fonts for typography. It uses third-party services for video embedding (Wistia, YouTube) and analytics/tracking (Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager). Hosting appears to be managed via Amazon Registrar, likely AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable uptime and DNS management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site lacks a CMS, indicating a custom or SPA architecture. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by adding security headers and improving privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with voxmate.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review voxmate.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.