Skip to main content

Security report for void.pt

Void Software · Technology · Portugal

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Void Software is a Portugal-based technology company specializing in custom software development, advanced AI integration, and embedded systems development. The company positions itself as a skilled, agile, and innovative technology partner offering a broad range of services including security, blockchain solutions, and DevOps. Their market approach targets businesses seeking cutting-edge technology solutions with a focus on quality and security. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and certifications that enhance trust. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. The site is moderately performant and well-optimized for mobile devices, though accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is present but could be improved. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or lightweight implementation. From a security perspective, the company demonstrates maturity through ISO 27001 certification and a suite of security services. However, the website lacks visible security headers and does not provide cookie consent mechanisms or incident response policies, which are important for compliance and security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the website and business present a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and a good security posture. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices would further enhance trust and reduce potential risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching void.pt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Void Software operates in the technology sector with a focus on AI, embedded systems, and custom software development. Their competitive advantage lies in combining advanced AI technologies with agile and smart development methodologies. The business model is service-oriented, targeting enterprises and organizations requiring tailored software and technology solutions. Revenue streams likely include project-based software development, consulting, and managed security services. The company maintains a professional partnership ecosystem, evidenced by certifications and quality seals. Growth indicators include adoption of AI-assisted development and blockchain technologies. Strategic observations suggest a focus on innovation and quality assurance to maintain market position.

Security posture

The company exhibits a mature security posture supported by ISO 27001 certification and a comprehensive suite of security services including vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, real-time threat detection, and compliance monitoring. However, the website itself lacks some security best practices such as security headers and published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. There is no evidence of GDPR cookie consent mechanisms, which may represent a compliance gap. Data protection officer contact information is not provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the security culture appears strong internally but could improve external communication and compliance visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance website security.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
  4. Provide contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to enhance compliance and trust.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Void Software
Description
Custom Software Development / Advanced AI Integration / Embedded Systems Development
Key services
Advanced AI Integration, Custom Software Development, Embedded Systems Development, Security Services, Blockchain & DLT Solutions, DevOps & CI/CD
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • ISO 27001 certified
  • Security vulnerability scanning
  • Penetration Testing
  • Real-time threat detection
  • Compliance monitoring
  • Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on advanced AI and embedded systems development.
  3. Certifications and quality seals enhance trustworthiness.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  5. No cookie policy or consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  6. No visible security headers detected; potential area for improvement.
  7. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies published.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious approach.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery. It does not appear to use a CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks, suggesting a custom or lightweight approach. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and animations that may impact load times. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. SEO is implemented at a basic level with meta tags and Open Graph data. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious design. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not explicitly available from the content. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by improving security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with void.pt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review void.pt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.