Skip to main content

Security report for void.pl

VOID.PL · Technology · Poland

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VOID.PL is a mature and established IT services company founded in 2010, specializing in bespoke IT solutions including systems and network support, software development, and consultancy. The company emphasizes close collaboration with customers, transparency, and proactive support. It operates primarily in Poland with associated companies in the UK and Estonia, supporting products like Smart DNS Proxy. The website reflects a professional business with good content quality and consistent branding, targeting businesses seeking outsourced IT operations and agile support services. Technically, the website uses a standard Apache server on Ubuntu, with front-end technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics. However, the site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical security gap. Security posture is weak due to missing SSL/TLS and absence of security headers or policies. Privacy compliance is poor with no visible privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with business claims. Overall, the site is functional but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching void.pl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VOID.PL holds a solid position in the IT outsourcing market, focusing on Ops-for-Hire services and bespoke IT solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in agile, customer-centric service delivery and a broad technology skill set including cloud platforms and network devices. The company supports multiple subsidiaries and partners, indicating a diversified business ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include managed IT services, consultancy, and software development. The target customers are businesses requiring reliable IT operations support. Growth indicators include long domain age and client testimonials from notable partners. Strategic partnerships with companies like Smart DNS Proxy enhance market reach. The company’s transparent communication and proactive approach foster trust and customer loyalty.

Security posture

The current security posture of VOID.PL is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No security headers or advanced SSL features like HSTS or OCSP stapling are implemented. The website lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. While no known vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the lack of encryption and security best practices significantly increases risk. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is questionable due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The company should prioritize SSL deployment, security header implementation, and formalize security and incident response policies to improve its security maturity and customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Install and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy including dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update website technologies and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VOID.PL Maciej Pędziwiatr
Registration number
473163945 (REGON)
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on an Apache 2.4.7 server on Ubuntu, serving static HTML with Bootstrap and jQuery for front-end UI. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a significant technical and security deficiency. Performance data is missing but inferred slow due to content-length and lack of optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements and mobile menu support. SEO is basic with meta tags but no Open Graph or structured data found. Accessibility features are minimal but present through semantic HTML and responsive design. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical stack is standard but outdated in security aspects and could benefit from modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with void.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review void.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.