Skip to main content

Security report for visualstudio.com

Microsoft Corporation · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Visual Studio, hosted at visualstudio.microsoft.com, is a flagship product of Microsoft Corporation, a leading global technology enterprise. The website offers comprehensive developer tools including an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) and code editor, targeting software developers across platforms and languages. Microsoft’s market position as a dominant technology provider is reinforced by the professional presentation and extensive service offerings visible on the site. The business model centers on providing software development tools and cloud integration services to a broad developer audience worldwide. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the Avada theme and leverages modern web technologies such as jQuery, New Relic for performance monitoring, Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics, and Adobe Target for marketing optimization. The site is hosted likely on Microsoft Azure infrastructure, ensuring robust performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility standards. SEO and metadata are well implemented, including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes multiple security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a clear privacy policy, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. However, explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly evident, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the website reflects a mature, secure, and professional digital presence consistent with Microsoft’s reputation. The absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain is expected and does not detract from legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing direct security contact channels to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visualstudio.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
70
Email security
78
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention visualstudio.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,156
Employees
0
Customers
2,106
Third parties
50
Weak passwords
15%

818 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for visualstudio.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Microsoft’s Visual Studio website serves as a critical channel for delivering its developer tools and services. The company’s market positioning as a technology leader is supported by a comprehensive ecosystem of software products and cloud services. Visual Studio targets professional developers and enterprises, offering both free and paid tools to foster adoption and integration with Microsoft’s broader cloud platform. The business model leverages software licensing, subscriptions, and cloud service consumption. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes integrations with Azure and GitHub, enhancing its competitive advantage. Growth indicators include continuous product updates, extensive documentation, and community engagement. The website’s professional design and content quality reinforce Microsoft’s brand strength and market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern SSL/TLS configurations, and multiple security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. Privacy compliance is evident through detailed policies and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. The use of reputable analytics and monitoring tools is managed with user consent, minimizing privacy risks. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response details, and vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may impact incident handling readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards for broader inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Microsoft Corporation
Description
Visual Studio dev tools & services make app development easy for any developer, on any platform & language. Develop with our code editor or IDE anywhere for free.
Key services
Integrated Development Environment (IDE), Code Editor, App Development Tools, Cloud Services Integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, jQuery, New Relic, Microsoft Clarity, Adobe Target, OneDS Analytics, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Avada Fusion Builder
Platforms
Windows, Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Use of reputable analytics with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, New Relic Browser, OneDS Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, New Relic Browser, Adobe Target
Marketing tools
Adobe Target, Microsoft Clarity, New Relic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong branding consistent with Microsoft Corporation.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of advanced analytics and performance monitoring tools with user consent.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; likely handled via corporate channels.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response page found on main site.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website is mobile optimized and SEO friendly.
  10. WHOIS data for subdomain not available, which is expected for subdomains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (WordPress) with a premium theme (Avada) and uses a modern tech stack including jQuery and advanced analytics tools like New Relic and Microsoft Clarity. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, ensuring scalability and reliability. Performance is optimized with responsive design and mobile-friendly layouts. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and employs cookie consent APIs for privacy compliance. Technical risks are minimal, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected. Opportunities exist to further modernize accessibility and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium17 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 84/100 +11Low22 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visualstudio.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visualstudio.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.