Skip to main content

Security report for virgo.hu

Virgo · Technology · Hungary

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Virgo is a well-established Hungarian technology company specializing in digital solutions that prioritize human experience. Founded in 2000, the company offers a broad range of IT services including product design, e-commerce solutions, digital accessibility, custom software development, operations services, IT staffing, and nearshore solutions. Their market position is supported by a portfolio of notable clients and detailed case studies demonstrating their expertise and impact. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as YouTube API and Facebook Pixel, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, though the absence of security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is limited by the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies, despite the presence of a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, Virgo presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with a strong business credibility score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching virgo.hu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Virgo operates as a service provider in the technology sector, targeting businesses seeking digital transformation and IT consulting. Their business model focuses on delivering tailored, high-impact solutions that address complex challenges. The company leverages a nearshore model to provide cost-effective services with cultural and time zone alignment. Revenue streams likely include project-based software development, staffing services, and product offerings such as the Verita platform. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including the promotion of related platforms like Virgo Verita. Growth indicators include a consistent content strategy with blogs and case studies, and a visible career section indicating ongoing talent acquisition. Strategic observations highlight Virgo's emphasis on accessibility and AI-driven advancements, positioning them competitively in the evolving digital landscape.

Security posture

Virgo's website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. The site uses Facebook Pixel for tracking, which is implemented with asynchronous loading to minimize performance impact. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is published, which is a compliance and operational gap. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, Virgo should enhance their security framework and communication to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen website security.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Virgo
Description
We address complex business challenges with sophisticated, tailored, high-impact solutions that put human experience at the forefront.
Key services
Product Design, E-commerce Solutions, Digital Accessibility, Custom Software Development, Operations Services, IT Specialist Staffing, Nearshore Solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, YouTube API, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
WordPress, Contact Form 7
Platforms
YouTube, Facebook
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Facebook Pixel with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on IT and digital solutions.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form and social media links; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the HTML.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and integrations with YouTube and Facebook Pixel.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy with domain age over 20 years.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Contact Form 7 plugin for form handling. It integrates external services including YouTube for video embedding and Facebook Pixel for marketing analytics. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript with responsive design techniques ensuring excellent mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with some large images and SVG decorations that may impact load times. The technical stack is current but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations such as caching and minification. Accessibility is addressed through digital accessibility services offered by the company, indicating awareness and implementation of accessibility standards. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data, improving search engine visibility and social media sharing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with virgo.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review virgo.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.