Skip to main content

Security report for vihta.com

Vihta-ajanvaraus · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vihta-ajanvaraus is a Finnish technology company specializing in cloud-based appointment booking and customer flow management solutions, primarily targeting healthcare organizations and small businesses. Their platform enables customers to conveniently book, modify, and cancel appointments online, complemented by self-service kiosks and queue management features. The company positions itself as a trusted local provider with notable references from Finnish healthcare institutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and frameworks, offering good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, but the business presence and content quality mitigate this risk. Overall, Vihta-ajanvaraus demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for enhanced security practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vihta.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vihta.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vihta-ajanvaraus operates in the technology sector with a focus on healthcare and organizational appointment management. Their SaaS business model leverages cloud technologies to deliver scalable solutions. The company benefits from strong local market penetration in Finland, supported by partnerships and references from major healthcare providers. Their competitive advantage lies in integrating appointment booking with customer flow and queue management, streamlining operations for clients. The business targets organizations requiring efficient customer handling, including medical labs and clinics. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and continuous content updates. Strategic observations suggest potential expansion into other Nordic markets, as indicated by the German site version.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, anonymized analytics tracking, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks publicly available security policies or incident response contacts, which could enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, suitable for the business type but with opportunities to strengthen defenses and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  4. Enhance form security with anti-spam measures and input validation to prevent abuse.
  5. Monitor domain registration status and consider WHOIS privacy or transparency to improve trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Netorek Aika Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vihta-ajanvaraus
Description
Vihta tarjoaa kotimaisen selainpohjaisen ajanvarauspalvelun, joka mahdollistaa asiakkaiden varata, muokata ja perua aikoja suoraan verkkosivuilta. Palvelu sisältää myös asiakasvirran hallinnan itseilmoittautumislaitteilla ja vuoronumeroasioinnin.
Key services
Selainpohjainen ajanvarauspalvelu, Itseilmoittautumisautomaatit, Vuoronumeroasiointi, Asiakasvirran hallinta
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Breakdance page builder, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (anonymized IP), Flow-Flow social stream plugin, Complianz GDPR cookie consent plugin, Jetpack
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of anonymize_ip in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Statistics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Statistics
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces trust score.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  6. Business targets Finnish market with localized content.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided.
  8. No security policy or incident response info found on site.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Breakdance page builder and uses jQuery along with several plugins for SEO (Rank Math), analytics (Google Analytics, Jetpack), cookie consent (Complianz), and social media integration (Flow-Flow). The site loads scripts asynchronously and defers non-critical resources, indicating attention to performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business scale, though hosting provider details are not explicit. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. The site structure and metadata are well implemented, supporting SEO and social sharing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vihta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vihta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.