Skip to main content

Security report for vigor.cz

EBE Inc. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paclik.eu is a Czech-based cybersecurity consultancy specializing in IT and OT security services, including compliance with directives such as NIS2 and risk management solutions like Enterprise Risk Analysis Manager. The company appears to be a small but established player in the cybersecurity sector, with a history dating back to 1997 and certifications such as ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and modern web technologies, providing relevant content and portfolio information targeted at organizations seeking cybersecurity expertise. Technically, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, and no suspicious patterns were detected. The site is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vigor.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector with a focus on cybersecurity services for IT and operational technology environments. Its market positioning is niche, targeting organizations requiring compliance with cybersecurity regulations and risk management. The business model is service-oriented, offering consulting, auditing, and software tools. Revenue streams likely come from consulting contracts and software licensing. The target customer segments include enterprises and government entities concerned with cybersecurity compliance. The company maintains a professional online presence with regular news updates, indicating active engagement with current cybersecurity trends. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website content. The company demonstrates trust through certifications and professional content but lacks some compliance documentation online.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The site uses standard WordPress plugins and libraries, with no visible outdated or vulnerable components. Contact forms are present but no explicit anti-spam or input validation details are visible. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency in incident response. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information by adding phone numbers and physical address to improve business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EBE Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EBE Inc.
Description
Poskytujeme služby v oblasti kybernetické a provozní bezpečnosti informačních a průmyslových technologií.
Key services
Kybernetická bezpečnost, Enterprise Risk Analysis Manager, Compliance with NIS2 directive, Cybersecurity auditing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 6, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Isotope.js, Owl Carousel, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related plugins (Contact Form 7)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and focused on cybersecurity services.
  2. Content is primarily in Czech language targeting local/regional clients.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is limited to email; no phone or physical address found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, leveraging popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Isotope for UI interactions and filtering. Font Awesome 6 is used for icons, and Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for visitor tracking. The site is hosted by INTERNET CZ, a.s., a reputable Czech hosting provider. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations; mobile responsiveness is good. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, though accessibility features are basic. The site uses Contact Form 7 for form handling but lacks visible advanced security or privacy features. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vigor.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vigor.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.