Video Text Remover AI · Technology
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.
Video Text Remover AI is a specialized online service that provides AI-powered tools to remove text, subtitles, captions, watermarks, logos, and other unwanted elements from video clips. The service targets creators, marketing teams, trainers, and localization editors who need to reuse or update video content without access to original project files. The website is well-structured, with comprehensive FAQs, examples, and demo videos illustrating the capabilities of the tool. The business model is credit-based with free trial runs, emphasizing ease of use and accessibility without mandatory login for initial steps. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Google Identity Services, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience across devices. The site employs HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating a good security posture. However, it lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms and detailed security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement in privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as no exposed sensitive data and use of modern frameworks, but could enhance trust by publishing vulnerability disclosure policies and expanding contact options. The domain WHOIS data aligns well with the website content, showing consistency and legitimacy without privacy protection, which is appropriate for this business type. Overall, Video Text Remover AI presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound online service with room to improve privacy compliance and security transparency to further strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. A consent mechanism is present (consent banner), but these analytics or marketing cookies were already set: Google Analytics (_ga_MCRVHKQVPK, _ga).
What to do: Configure the consent platform to block these tags until the visitor accepts the matching category.
Guard opened the site in a separate, fresh browser profile, refused consent ("Decline" button) as a visitor would, then reloaded the page. These analytics or marketing cookies were set after the refusal: Google Analytics (_ga_MCRVHKQVPK). Requests also went to Google Analytics (region1.google-analytics.com). Storing them after a refusal has no consent basis under ePrivacy Art. 5(3); the CNIL fined Yahoo EUR 10 million in December 2023 for advertising cookies placed although visitors had refused…
What to do: Tie every tag to its consent category in the consent platform or tag manager so it stays blocked after a refusal, then repeat the check: reject, reload, and confirm no analytics or marketing cookies appear.
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention videotextremover.net, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for videotextremover.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with videotextremover.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review videotextremover.net.