Skip to main content

Security report for vhx.tv

Vimeo · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vimeo is a well-established enterprise technology company specializing in video hosting, streaming, and monetization services. The company offers a comprehensive OTT platform enabling content creators and businesses to launch and monetize their own video channels. Vimeo holds a strong market position with a broad target audience including enterprises, marketers, educators, and creative professionals. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Next.js, AWS hosting, and integrated experimentation and consent management tools. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, domain registration protections, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, although DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit vulnerability disclosure is found. Overall, Vimeo demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance suitable for an enterprise-grade platform.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vhx.tv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vhx.tv

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
70
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vimeo operates in the technology and media sectors, providing video streaming and hosting solutions with a subscription and service-based business model. The company targets a diverse customer base from individual creators to large enterprises. Vimeo's competitive advantages include a strong brand, extensive feature set (video player, live streaming, analytics, collaboration), and integration capabilities. The company is part of IAC, a large parent organization, which supports its enterprise scale and market reach. Vimeo's ecosystem includes partnerships and developer resources, enhancing its platform extensibility. Growth indicators include continuous product releases and a comprehensive resource and learning center. Vimeo's strategic focus on video monetization and OTT services positions it well in the evolving digital media landscape.

Security posture

Vimeo exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, domain status protections, and published security and privacy policies. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The site uses consent management and experimentation platforms responsibly. However, the lack of a publicly available vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file and explicit incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Overall, Vimeo's security practices align with enterprise expectations, supporting trust and compliance with regulations such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact channels on the website for security issues.
  4. Consider obtaining and displaying recognized security certifications to enhance trust.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Vimeo, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vimeo
Description
Vimeo OTT transforms videos into a full-scale video streaming service. Start your own OTT channel today to start making money with your video content.
Key services
Video hosting, Video player, Video monetization, Live streaming, Video editing, Video analytics, Video collaboration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by Next.js usage), Next.js, AWS DNS, Eppo experimentation platform, Elfsight widgets, Transcend consent management, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
AWS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • Use of security page and privacy policies
  • Use of consent management scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Eppo experimentation platform, Builder.io analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
builder.io pixel
Marketing tools
Eppo experimentation platform, Elfsight widgets, Transcend consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong brand presence and consistent design.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, hosted on AWS infrastructure. It leverages third-party services for experimentation (Eppo), consent management (Transcend), and UI widgets (Elfsight). The site demonstrates fast performance, mobile optimization, and good accessibility standards. SEO is well addressed with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of Builder.io suggests a headless CMS approach for content management. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible outdated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to further modernize DNS security and enhance transparency around security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vhx.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vhx.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.