Skip to main content

Security report for vetonaula.fi

Vetonaula · Technology · Finland

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vetonaula is a Finnish IT service provider specializing in offering outsourced IT teams as a subscription-based service. The company targets Finnish businesses seeking to improve their IT solutions by leveraging expert IT teams easily and flexibly. The website presents a professional and modern digital presence, built on WordPress with integration of standard web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Structured data is implemented to enhance SEO and provide clear organization information. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, although explicit privacy and terms of service policies are missing, which impacts compliance confidence. Contact information is not directly visible on the homepage, which may affect user trust and engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 84 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

    • Medium

      Mixed Content Detected

      4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

      What to do: Ensure all resources (images, scripts, stylesheets) are loaded over HTTPS

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching vetonaula.fi

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vetonaula.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for vetonaula.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vetonaula operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT outsourcing services in Finland. The business model revolves around providing IT teams as a service with monthly billing, targeting SMEs or small businesses that require flexible IT support without the overhead of full-time staff. The company appears to maintain a niche market position with a clear value proposition. The website content and metadata emphasize ease of ordering and professional IT expertise. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies, and no direct partnerships are listed. The company leverages modern marketing and tracking tools but maintains a basic level of advertising transparency. Growth potential is indicated by the professional presentation and use of modern digital tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers configured, including HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a published privacy policy and terms of service reduces transparency and may expose the company to compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, which could delay response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with formal policy publication and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy documents accessible from the website footer.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including security incident contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vetonaula
Description
Meiltä saat iloisen ja osaavan IT-tiimin helposti tilattavana palveluna. Tutustu palveluihimme ja paranna yrityksesi IT-ratkaisuja.
Key services
IT outsourcing, IT team as a service, IT solutions improvement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, Gravity Forms
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is in Finnish language targeting Finnish IT service customers
  2. Uses modern web technologies and standard security practices
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. Structured data (JSON-LD) is well implemented with organization and webpage schema
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and Google services such as Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management. The site uses optimized fonts and images, and the CSS is well structured with custom styles for UI components like accordions and tabs. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, with opportunities to improve accessibility and formalize compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vetonaula.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vetonaula.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.