Skip to main content

Security report for versus-software.gr

VERSUS SOFTWARE ΟΕ · Technology · Greece

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VERSUS SOFTWARE ΟΕ is a Greek technology company specializing in website construction, e-commerce solutions, mobile app development, and custom software services. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking comprehensive digital solutions, positioning itself as a reliable local provider with a focus on quality and client satisfaction. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content. Technically, the site employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates analytics and consent management tools like Google Analytics and Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, uses CSRF protection, and manages cookie consent effectively, though it could improve by implementing additional security headers and publishing a formal security policy. Overall, the site demonstrates good compliance with GDPR and offers transparent contact information, supporting trustworthiness and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching versus-software.gr

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, providing essential digital services including web and software development. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored solutions such as e-shops and mobile applications. The presence of detailed privacy and cookie policies, along with contact details, suggests a customer-centric approach and adherence to regulatory requirements. The use of Google Tag Manager and MailChimp indicates active marketing and customer engagement strategies. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a stable market position in Greece, without indications of subsidiaries or parent companies. The website content and structure support a professional image, aiding in competitive differentiation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of security cookies like XSRF-TOKEN to prevent cross-site request forgery. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could enhance the security maturity. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business scale but could be strengthened to mitigate advanced threats and demonstrate a proactive security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a security-aware culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VERSUS SOFTWARE ΟΕ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VERSUS SOFTWARE ΟΕ
Description
Κατασκευή Ιστοσελίδων, E-shop, Custom Web Εφαρμογών. Υπηρεσίες Ανάπτυξης Λογισμικού, Photodesk, Pressdesk, AdDesk, Διαχείριση Φωτογραφικού Αρχείου, Διαχείριση Υλης, Διαχείριση Αγγελιών, Διαχείριση Φωτοαγγελιών, Διαχείριση Διαφημίσεων, Αυτόματη Σελιδοποίηση
Key services
Website development, E-shop creation, Mobile app development, Custom software solutions, Content and advertisement management systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Laravel (implied by laravel_session cookie)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSRF token cookie (XSRF-TOKEN)
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Facebook Ads, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
MailChimp (mentioned in privacy policy)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with active consent management
  3. Clear contact information including physical address, phone, and email
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  6. Good compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations
  7. Business information is consistent and credible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons, ensuring a modern and mobile-friendly user interface. It leverages jQuery and integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent management, alongside Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing analytics. The presence of Laravel session cookies indicates backend usage of the Laravel PHP framework. Performance appears moderate with standard optimization practices. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is well-suited for a small technology service provider, though opportunities exist for modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with versus-software.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review versus-software.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.