Skip to main content

Security report for veocapital.com

VEO Capital · Technology · Malta

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VEO Capital is a Malta-headquartered investment and incubation company specializing in MedTech, Cloud, and AI-based business models across Europe. The company focuses on building market-leading companies through proprietary incubation processes, investment, and digital transformation services. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging WordPress with the Divi theme and integrating analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Tag Manager. While the site is well-designed and mobile-optimized, some technical issues such as video playback errors and lack of cookie consent mechanisms are present. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Overall, the domain registration and business information are consistent and legitimate, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching veocapital.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
35
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VEO Capital positions itself as a key player in European technology investment, particularly in healthcare technology and AI sectors. Their business model combines incubation and active investment with operational support, targeting startups and digital transformation opportunities. The company maintains active social media channels on Facebook and LinkedIn, enhancing their market visibility. The website content is focused on attracting potential partners, investors, and talent, with a dedicated careers section. The absence of detailed financial or regulatory disclosures suggests a private company profile. The company appears to be growing steadily since its founding in 2015, with a clear focus on innovation-driven sectors.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against certain web attacks. The presence of third-party analytics scripts introduces moderate tracking but no explicit cookie consent is implemented, which may raise GDPR compliance concerns. The video playback errors indicate potential misconfiguration or unsupported media formats, which could affect user experience and indicate a need for better media management. No public security policies or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, explicit privacy controls, and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Resolve video playback issues by verifying media formats and hosting configurations or providing fallback content.
  4. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks and improve privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VEO Capital
Description
VEO Capital builds, incubates and invests in MedTech, Cloud- & AI-based business models in Europe. Headquartered in Malta, they focus on enabling tomorrow's technology.
Key services
Incubation, Investment, Digital Transformation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, MediaElement.js, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and custom fullwidth header plugin
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page; contact via contact page
  3. Social media links to Facebook and LinkedIn are present and active
  4. Video content has playback errors indicating possible media format or hosting issues
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found
  6. Privacy policy is present but basic and lacks explicit GDPR compliance statements
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  8. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available
  9. Website is well designed, mobile optimized, and professionally maintained
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS platform. It uses jQuery and MediaElement.js for media handling, with Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site loads multiple font families from Google Fonts and uses custom plugins for fullwidth headers and animations. Performance is moderate with some heavy video content that currently fails to play properly. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumb navigation. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from optimization of media delivery and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with veocapital.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veocapital.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.