Skip to main content

Security report for venn.build

Venn Network · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Venn Network is a technology company focused on providing decentralized security infrastructure for blockchain ecosystems. Their platform offers a decentralized firewall and security network designed to protect dApps, chains, rollups, smart wallets, and stakers. The company positions itself as a unified security framework facilitating Web3 adoption by enabling builders, node operators, security teams, and stakers to collaborate and secure their ecosystems. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern analytics and consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital presence. However, explicit contact information and detailed security policies are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust and transparency. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, which is common and justified for security-focused businesses. Overall, Venn Network demonstrates a strong market position in blockchain security with reputable partnerships and a clear value proposition.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching venn.build

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Venn Network targets blockchain developers, node operators, security providers, and stakers, offering a decentralized security network that integrates on-chain and off-chain resources. Their business model revolves around providing security infrastructure as a service, including SDKs for security teams and client SDKs for chains and rollups. The company has established partnerships with well-known security firms and ecosystem players, enhancing its credibility and reach. The website content and ecosystem branding indicate a focus on innovation and collaboration within the Web3 security space. Revenue streams likely include staking services, node operation incentives, and SDK usage. The absence of direct contact details suggests a controlled communication approach, possibly to maintain security and privacy. Growth indicators include an active roadmap, community engagement, and a comprehensive ecosystem of partners.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating good privacy practices. It uses reputable third-party analytics tools with opt-in consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. No security headers were detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP security configurations. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is appropriate for the business type. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing detailed security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and incident response procedures.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add explicit contact information for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Venn Network
Description
Security infrastructure that makes it easy to protect your ecosystem.
Key services
Decentralized firewall, Security network for protocols, Node operator services, Security team collaboration, Staking and restaking yields, SDK for security providers, Client SDK for chains and rollups
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Segment Analytics, Finsweet Cookie Consent, jQuery 3.5.1, WebFont Loader
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Segment Analytics
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and modern design with clear navigation and mobile optimization.
  3. Strong focus on decentralized security infrastructure for blockchain ecosystems.
  4. Presence of comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the website.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking tools with consent.
  7. Partnerships with reputable security firms and ecosystem participants.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  10. Domain WHOIS uses privacy protection, typical for this industry.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, Hotjar, and Finsweet Cookie Consent for analytics and privacy compliance. The site uses jQuery 3.5.1 and WebFont Loader for font management. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical infrastructure reflects a modern, well-maintained web presence suitable for a technology company in the blockchain security sector. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and provide more detailed technical documentation on security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with venn.build. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review venn.build.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.