Skip to main content

Security report for veeam.com

Veeam Company · Technology · Switzerland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Veeam Software is a well-established enterprise specializing in backup, disaster recovery, and intelligent data management software for virtual, physical, and multi-cloud infrastructures. Founded in 2006 and headquartered in Baar, Switzerland, it operates under the parent company Insight Partners. The website presents a professional and comprehensive digital presence, targeting IT professionals and enterprises seeking robust data portability and resilience solutions. The company emphasizes secure backup, rapid recovery, and data management freedom across cloud and physical platforms. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Adobe DTM for tag management, Font Awesome for icons, and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and business information representation. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and well-structured, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs best practices such as canonical URLs and structured data but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data is a notable anomaly, raising questions about domain transparency despite the legitimate business content and branding. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching veeam.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
67
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention veeam.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
28,563
Employees
90
Customers
28,051
Third parties
422
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-10 · 65 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for veeam.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –login.veeam.com2026-06-10
  • –adfs.veeam.com2026-06-09
  • –adfs.veeam.com2026-06-06
  • –adfs.veeam.com2026-06-04
  • –propartner.veeam.com2026-05-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Veeam holds a strong market position in the technology sector, focusing on data backup and disaster recovery software. Its business model revolves around software licensing and cloud data management services, catering primarily to enterprise clients and IT professionals. The company benefits from backing by Insight Partners, enhancing its financial and strategic capabilities. The website's content and structured data indicate a clear focus on cloud computing, data compression, deduplication, and disaster recovery technologies. The absence of detailed WHOIS data suggests possible use of privacy services or alternative domain registration strategies, which is uncommon for enterprises of this scale. The company maintains a global presence with multi-language support on its website, indicating a broad international target audience. Partnerships and parent company relationships are clearly stated, supporting credibility and growth potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks several important security best practices such as explicit security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.), published security policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No security.txt or dedicated incident response contacts were found, which limits transparency and readiness communication. The WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain trust and transparency. The site does not show signs of vulnerabilities or malicious content but could benefit from enhanced security documentation and contact channels to improve incident response and compliance with regulations like GDPR and NIS2. Overall, the security posture is good but not comprehensive.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response page including dedicated security contact emails (e.g., security@veeam.com).
  4. Establish and link to a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Clarify domain registration details or improve WHOIS transparency to strengthen domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Veeam Company
Description
Veeam Software is a privately held information technology company that develops backup, disaster recovery and intelligent data management software for virtual, physical and multi-cloud infrastructures.
Key services
Backup, Disaster recovery, Intelligent data management, Data portability across cloud, virtual, and physical platforms
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe DTM (Adobe Dynamic Tag Manager), Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Maps (location link), JSON-LD structured data, Canonical link, Open Graph protocol, Twitter Cards, CSS client libraries, JavaScript, Google Analytics (implied by meta tags)
Frameworks
Adobe DTM
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile optimized)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of canonical URLs
  • Use of structured data for organization info

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe DTM, Google Analytics (implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM, Google Analytics (implied)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain, unusual for enterprise
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML
  4. Contact information limited to a US phone number with sales context
  5. Use of modern web technologies and structured data
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No explicit security or incident response contact emails found
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  9. Strong branding and consistent messaging
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Adobe Experience Manager (implied by clientlibs), Adobe DTM for tag management, and Font Awesome for iconography. It uses JSON-LD structured data to provide rich metadata about the organization, improving SEO and data interoperability. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and performance, with multiple language versions indicating a global reach. No CMS-specific vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses canonical URLs and Open Graph tags for social media integration. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, modern, and aligned with enterprise standards, though some security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low19 findingsView report
  2. 85/100Low17 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with veeam.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veeam.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.