Skip to main content

Security report for vee-crm.com

Vee · Technology · Israel

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website vee-crm.com appears to be a test or demo page related to Vee CRM and accessibility plugin services. The business focuses on providing accessibility tools and CRM software solutions, targeting businesses or website owners seeking to improve accessibility compliance. The site is relatively new, founded in 2023, and hosted on InMotion Hosting with a JetServer platform. The technical infrastructure is basic, utilizing standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with an accessibility plugin from Moostash. The site lacks a CMS and advanced frameworks, indicating a simple deployment. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. No privacy or cookie policies are directly present on the site, and no contact information or forms are provided, limiting user engagement and compliance transparency. Social media links exist but appear personal rather than corporate. No analytics or advertising tools are detected, suggesting minimal tracking or marketing activities. Overall, the website demonstrates a basic digital maturity level with moderate security posture but significant gaps in privacy compliance and content richness. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, aligning with the business profile. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and content development are advised to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vee-crm.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vee operates in the technology sector, focusing on accessibility solutions and CRM software. The business model is SaaS-oriented, targeting niche markets requiring website accessibility compliance. The company is small and newly founded in 2023, with no publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership with Moostash for accessibility plugins indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include software licensing and service subscriptions. The market positioning is niche with potential growth in accessibility compliance services. Competitive advantages include specialized accessibility tools integrated with CRM functionalities. The absence of detailed business information and contact data limits transparency but aligns with the test/demo nature of the site.

Security posture

The current security maturity is basic. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain transfer protection is enabled, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks. No incident response or security policy information is available, indicating limited preparedness for security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies on the main site. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content, but the minimal security controls suggest room for improvement. Enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security and privacy policies would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Add clear contact information and business details to enhance transparency and user trust.
  5. Improve accessibility plugin integration to avoid error messages and enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vee
Description
The website appears to be a test/demo page related to Vee CRM and accessibility plugin services, offering accessibility tools and links to purchase software.
Key services
Accessibility plugin, CRM software
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Accessibility Plugin by Moostash, InMotion Hosting
Platforms
JetServer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a test/demo page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy directly on the site, only linked external accessibility policy.
  3. No contact information or forms present on the site.
  4. Accessibility plugin is integrated but shows an error message indicating ruler display is not possible.
  5. Social media links present but point to personal or unrelated profiles.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. HTTPS is enabled and domain status is clientTransferProhibited.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled which is a security improvement opportunity.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technical stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, hosted on InMotion Hosting using JetServer. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a lightweight and straightforward infrastructure. The accessibility plugin is sourced from Moostash, integrated via external scripts. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is basic, and SEO features are minimal. The site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. The domain is relatively new, consistent with the business age. Overall, the technical setup is functional but basic, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vee-crm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vee-crm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.