Skip to main content

Security report for usc.edu

University of Southern California · Education · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The University of Southern California (USC) is a leading private research university with a strong global and regional presence. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive academic and research information targeted at students, faculty, researchers, and the general public. The site employs modern web technologies including WordPress CMS, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and CookieYes for consent management, indicating a well-managed technical infrastructure. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced and use of monitoring tools like New Relic, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and active consent mechanisms. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity suitable for an enterprise-level educational institution.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching usc.edu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

USC operates as an essential entity in the education sector, providing a wide range of academic programs and research initiatives. The website's structure and content emphasize its leadership in education and research, targeting prospective and current students, faculty, and global partners. The business model is centered on education and research services, with a strong emphasis on community and global engagement. The site’s use of SEO and analytics tools suggests a focus on digital outreach and user engagement. No direct revenue streams or commercial partnerships were identified in the content analyzed. The institution maintains a consistent brand and messaging aligned with its market position as a top-tier university.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of New Relic for monitoring and CookieYes for consent management indicates proactive security and privacy practices. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not detected in the HTML content, which could be enhanced to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts were found, suggesting an opportunity to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from additional security hardening and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility, including official emails and phone numbers for support and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
University of Southern California
Description
USC is one of the world's leading research universities. At USC, the human spirit is cultivated through learning, research and creativity.
Key services
Academic programs, Research initiatives, Community and global engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CookieYes Consent Management, Hotjar, Adobe Fonts (Typekit), Yoast SEO plugin, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  5. No exposed sensitive information or suspicious external links.
  6. Strong branding and consistent navigation structure.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. No explicit terms of service page detected in the analyzed content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with integration of popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and CookieYes for SEO and privacy compliance respectively. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with Hotjar for user behavior analysis. Adobe Fonts are used for typography, enhancing branding consistency. The site shows good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of multiple third-party scripts. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and well integrated, supporting a large enterprise educational institution's needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with usc.edu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review usc.edu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.