Skip to main content

Security report for urovo.com

urovo · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UROVO is a professional manufacturer and provider of Android-based POS terminals, mobile computers, RFID devices, healthcare devices, rugged tablets, barcode scanners, and printers. The company targets enterprise customers, resellers, and independent software vendors (ISVs) with a comprehensive product portfolio and partner programs. Their market position is that of a leading industry application enabler with a global presence and sustainability recognition such as the EcoVadis Silver Medal. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not publicly disclosed. The WHOIS data for the subdomain en.urovo.com is missing, which slightly reduces trustworthiness, but the overall professional presentation and business information support legitimacy. Privacy compliance is good with clear policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and business credible with room for improvement in security transparency and WHOIS data availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching urovo.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UROVO operates in the technology and manufacturing sectors, focusing on mobile computing and payment terminal hardware and software solutions. Their business model includes direct sales, partner programs for resellers and ISVs, and global distribution. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through product diversity, sustainability awards, and global sales networks. Their target customers are enterprises requiring rugged and specialized mobile devices for logistics, retail, healthcare, and manufacturing. The website content and partner ecosystem indicate a mature business with strategic growth and industry recognition. However, the lack of detailed WHOIS data for the subdomain and absence of explicit security policies may warrant further due diligence for partners and customers.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating attention to basic security and privacy compliance. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security.txt files. The site uses third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager, which should be regularly audited for security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, implementing security headers, and providing incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data transparency by ensuring domain registration information is complete and accessible.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
urovo
Description
UROVO provides professional POS Android terminals & other mobile computers device solutions equipped with efficient custom enterprise enabled software.
Key services
Payment Terminals, Mobile Computers, RFID Devices, Healthcare Devices, Rugged Tablets, Barcode Scanners, Printers, Software Tools, Partner Programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Bootstrap, WOW.js, Google Tag Manager, Layer.js, LayUI
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile optimized)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear product and partner information
  3. Comprehensive product catalog and partner programs
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information found
  6. WHOIS data for subdomain is missing, limiting domain trust verification
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and responsive design with Bootstrap and jQuery, enhanced by animation libraries like WOW.js and Swiper.js for carousels. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with adaptive layouts and fast loading images. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are present but could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, canonical links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence suitable for enterprise customers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with urovo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review urovo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.