Skip to main content

Security report for urda.lv

SIA "ZAAO" Dabas un tehnoloģiju parks “URDA” · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "ZAAO" Dabas un tehnoloģiju parks “URDA” operates as an educational and environmental organization in Latvia, providing nature and technology park experiences and educational programs for preschoolers, school children, and adults. The website reflects a well-structured, content-rich platform targeting local communities and educational institutions, supported by partnerships with universities and environmental organizations. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics and FontAwesome, with responsive design and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible advanced security headers. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website's professional presentation and clear contact information support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and focused on environmental education.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching urda.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention urda.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for urda.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a key player in environmental education within Latvia, leveraging partnerships with academic and governmental institutions to enhance its offerings. Its business model centers on educational programs, events, and community engagement, targeting a broad audience from preschool children to adults. The presence of multiple partner domains and clear registration details enhances credibility. The website's content and navigation support user engagement and program enrollment, indicating a stable operational model with growth potential in the education and non-profit sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies suggest room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of WHOIS data limits full trust assessment, but the overall security culture appears adequate for the site's scope.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and privacy policies, including incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to proactively identify and mitigate risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "ZAAO" Dabas un tehnoloģiju parks “URDA”
Registration number
44103015509
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "ZAAO" Dabas un tehnoloģiju parks “URDA”
Description
SIA "ZAAO" Dabas un tehnoloģiju parks "URDA" piedāvā nodarbības gan pirmsskolēniem, gan skolēniem, gan pieaugušajiem. Piedāvā universālu radošu dabaszinātņu apmācību.
Key services
Nodarbības pirmsskolām, Nodarbības skolām, Nodarbības pieaugušajiem, Pasākumu organizēšana, Izglītojoši projekti un materiāli
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Bootstrap (dropdowns, responsive menu), jQuery (implied by bootstrap dropdowns), Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with an English language option.
  3. Clear cookie consent banner present with link to cookie policy.
  4. No visible forms on the homepage; forms likely on subpages.
  5. Multiple social media profiles linked (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube).
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info.
  8. Business contact info clearly provided in footer with emails and phone numbers.
  9. Website focuses on environmental education and community engagement.
  10. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern tech stack with external libraries like FontAwesome and Google Analytics, ensuring a visually appealing and trackable user experience. The responsive design and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility is basic. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in SEO and accessibility. The lack of CMS identification suggests a custom or less common platform. Hosting details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced security and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with urda.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review urda.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.