Skip to main content

Security report for uraga.lt

Uraga · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uraga is a small creative digital production agency specializing in games, cinematics, and AR/VR/XR interactive content creation. The company positions itself as a digital metaverse producer collaborating globally with brands and game companies to create impactful projects. The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging standard Wix technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics. While the site is visually professional and mobile optimized, it lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and advanced security headers. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain trust verification. Overall, the technical infrastructure is moderate with room for improvement in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uraga.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uraga.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
7
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uraga.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Uraga targets a niche market of digital creatives and interactive content producers, focusing on emerging technologies like AR, VR, and metaverse experiences. Their business model revolves around project-based collaborations with brands and game companies worldwide. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand identity and professional content quality. However, limited public business information and lack of contact details may impact client trust and lead generation. The use of Wix suggests a lean operational model with reliance on third-party platforms for hosting and CMS. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency about domain ownership. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhanced headers, privacy policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish a security policy or incident response contact to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Uraga
Description
We create interactive digital world for positive real life changes. We are Creatives, Storytellers, Digital Metaverse Producers - a team dedicated to collaborate with brands, game companies & people from all over the world to create life changing projects.
Key services
Digital production, Games, Cinematics, AR/VR/XR interactive content creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  6. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. Content is relevant to digital production and interactive media services.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, which provides a stable hosting environment and CMS. The tech stack includes Wix's proprietary scripts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with standard Wix optimizations. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no advanced structured data beyond a simple WebSite schema. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain verification. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small creative agency but could be enhanced with better security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uraga.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uraga.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.